<p>yeah i got empirical for one (something about a teacher basing information solely off of exact data).
I dont remember pragmatic, do you remember the question?</p>
<p>Hey what did you guys get for one of the critical reading question
- impracticality of an undertaking
- unlikelihood of implementing a policy
forgot the passage…which one?</p>
<p>would .001 work for the w and w^2 one? I think it would, not sure though.</p>
<p>Anyone remember the exact wording of the essay question?</p>
<p>Okay. In the experimental Math section, what questions were in it? Was it the prime number question and the Chemistry/Physics Question? Because I got those two wrong. </p>
<p>And also, does 1/10 work for the w, w^2, ratio question? That was my answer, but I don’t remember the exact question.</p>
<p>and did you guys get Discord for the first Hip-Hop question? I justified it because it talked about the battles within hip-hop for the real meaning and how there were two different viewpoints, mainstream and underground, and they were in disarray in search for the actual identity of hip-hop? lol</p>
<p>@Yvonne416, I got those 2 answers also, but CR isn’t my best section 
Can anyone confirm?</p>
<p>@Adeeetz, I got Discord for one, too!</p>
<p>@Bryster126, I believe .001 would work. There were many things it could’ve been… I wonder how they’d grade it lol. Because it’s any number 1/11 and smaller.</p>
<p>@randomly wait 1/10 wouldn’t work for the w, w^2 ratio question???
and nice, discord did make sense!</p>
<p>I don’t think so Because the question asked which number, w, would make the ratio w:w^2 <em>greater</em> than the ratio 10:1… But I don’t think you should worry. You seem like you got many of the other questions correct! :)</p>
<p>I used .025 which worked. As long as w/w^2 > 10, you were fine I think.</p>
<p>@randomly okay haha! Just 1 problem. This was my first time taking the SAT, and I’m a junior so I still have time If i don’t do too well. This test did scare me a bit though, because it was little more challenging. And do you remember if that w^2 ratio question was in the same section as the prime number, p*, section?</p>
<p>The w:w^2 question was in the grid-in section :X… so I don’t think so :(. Either way, I think the math in this test was challenging, well some questions. And the Blue Book math is much easier, IMO, if that’s what you’re comparing the actual test to.</p>
<p>Yeah. Compared to the Blue Book, this test was ridiculous. Hopefully the curve will compensate, I need 760+ on math :(</p>
<p>I completely agree. Ughhh Hurricane Sandy whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy</p>
<p>i thought the girl’s designs on the rug showed her creativity, not her lack of artistic vision. Don’t tell me that when you were reading that part, you were thinking ‘oh, she soooo doesnt have any artistic vision’–at least for me, when i was reading about her peacock and vine motifs i thought ‘wow, shes a pretty creative girl!’ second, i thought that the 3x7 teardrop rug design was more beautiful because of its coherence, not its symbolism. the uncle’s entire point was that only coherence can produce beauty, and he even asks her what ties together all of her motifs, to which she admits that her designs have nothing to do with each other and were incoherent. the design was not beautiful because it was symbolic, it was beautiful because it was much more simplistic and unified.</p>
<p>So which math section was experimental? Was it the p*, the % failing, etc</p>
<p>We don’t know. But I’m guessing it’s the p* section</p>
<p>Benedict its lack of artistic focus because you even said that the uncle’s design was better because of its coherence aka - lack of artistic focus on the girls part.</p>
<p>@benedictharold I got lack of artistic focus and symbolism. You may be right, but most of the people on this thread got what I answered so we won’t know until December 4th lol</p>