NYTimes article: SAT marketing new products in a push to the classroom

<p>“For SAT Maker, a Broader Push to the Classroom”</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>The following article, also from the August 16 NYT online edition, certainly does drive home the point made in the above cited article that the SAT faces strong competition from the ACT.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>The governance of the College Board seems to be something of a mystery bag. Although supposedly a membership organization for colleges and secondary schools, it is headed by a former politician and businessman who is its public face and certainly makes the organization seem more a profit-orientated corporate than a non-profit educational organization. The question of who, exactly, the College Board is becomes even more signficant given the spread of the AP regimen, which is becoming a de facto national standardized curriculum. Who are these people, who are they accountable to and should we be trusting them with this responsibility, especially since they now seem to be trying to extend their influence into the lower grades?</p>

<p>If the College Board can help ensure that high school graduates are actually literate and numerate, more power to them.</p>

<p>CB has been in the high schools, directly and indirectly, for years and doesn’t seem to have made much difference. They seem eminently unqualified to be meddling in K-8 schools when compared to organizations like the Core Knowledge Foundation, which has a good track record of involvement in K-8 schools, improving curriculum, achievement and equity.</p>

<p>Well, does Core Knowledge do anything to hurt one’s SAT I scores? I have no reason to suppose that Core Knowledge and College Board would be working at cross purposes if both get involved in more K-8 school reform efforts.</p>

<p>as a student whos taken the SAT numerous times over, i detest wat the CB stands for. i even sent a 12 page essay in as an application essay to harvard decrying what CB has come to represent in our society. i’m really alarmed at this latest venture into the middle school ground CB is taking. for far too long the CB has been more about profit then about helping students learn. the ap program they hail as a savior is little more than a money-making scheme that doesn’t help students that much in getting college credit. </p>

<p>it’s just disturbing that CB is now trying to corrupt oops i mean help middle schoolers now. god help us =/</p>

<p>While the CB’s venture into 6-12 education without a doubt does promote the AP/SAT culture of testing as the gold standard of secondary educational rigor, I agree with tokenadult that any effort at reform aimed to ensure that high school graduates are truly prepared to enter college (whether a CC or 4-yr IHE) and become part of an educated workforce is laudable. As to accountability and the question of just who is behind this initiative, well, the CB (in its capacity as a non-profit organization) received an initial grant of $4.4 million, in 2003, from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to create six small College Board Schools in New York City. So you have to look to the Gates Foundation, as well as other Foundations involved in the projects for more information. These model schools are designed to target urban, low SES and minority students so that they can benefit from the opportunity to take “challenging” college level AP level courses and exams. Since 2003, the program has expanded beyond the six New York City schools.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://citymayors.com/news/nyc_schools_gates.html[/url]”>http://citymayors.com/news/nyc_schools_gates.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>The following is from the Gates Foundation web site:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Education/TransformingHighSchools/Schools/ModelSchools/CollegeBoard.htm[/url]”>http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Education/TransformingHighSchools/Schools/ModelSchools/CollegeBoard.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>If they help with more activities for classrooms and to enhance teacher training that would be a great thing and always welcome.</p>

<p>According to Harvard though science AP classes really don’t do much to predict success in college and they don’t give kids any real advantage over students in the regular track. I hope the CB will work with NSTA and other exisitng groups to enhance and help deliver those national standards and curriculums.</p>

<p>Link</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2006/02/17-ap.html[/url]”>http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2006/02/17-ap.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Given the fast pace of change in education reform and increased demands for accountability and academic excellence, the CB has a lot on its plate these days. While the controversy over whether or not the AP curricula and exam regimen give students an edge over comparable honors classes is open to debate, the issues here center on a new role for the CB that would make it a primary mover and shaker in educational reform because it is moving into a niche where there is a deficiency in precisely those high caliber honors courses noted in the Harvard Gazette article. </p>

<p>The CB model high schools, since it is bank rolled in large part by the Gates Foundation, can be seen as part of the larger Gates’ project that aims to promote the reconfiguration of existing, under performing schools as well as the creation new, smaller high schools. The new CB model schools, and the 6-12 English and math curriculum products, will obviously rely on CB products to create the rigorous college-prep programs, and it is these higher level courses and products that educators involved in the project deem to be a key component to facilitate and engage teachers in their efforts to combat student apathy and improve academic achievement. </p>

<p>According to the Education Sector, the Gates Foundation is now keenly aware that teachers must be fully inolved and engaged in a viable teacher-student relationship if the reform process is to be successful. At this point it is also obvious that this is easier said than done. The Gates Foundation is pouring more money into studies to find out exactly in what ways the ideas of “rigor”, “relevance” and “relationships” play out in the classroom because so far, the Gates experiment in high school reform has only yielded a slight increase in reading literacy but not much in math and science.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:1kjLGVGkH_cJ:www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/Measured_Progress.pdf+EducationSector+model+schools&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a[/url]”>http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:1kjLGVGkH_cJ:www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/Measured_Progress.pdf+EducationSector+model+schools&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>In the context of high school reform, math and science literacy and the role of the CB, it is worth noting that the CB also got a large chunk of change from the National Science Foundation to overhaul the AP program:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6300[/url]”>http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6300&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;