NYTimes: Cheating on an Ethics Test? It’s ‘Topic A’ at Columbia

<p>Shades of Calvin and Hobbes - cheating and grade grubbing is back in the news, but this time with an ironic twist. Quite a few threads ago I mentioned a Calvin and Hobbes strip that posed the question “is it better to do the right thing and fail… or is it better to do the wrong thing and succeed? …in the real world, people care about success, not principles. … Then again, maybe that’s why the world is in such a mess. What a dilemma!” Dilemma, indeed and especially so (as in the Calvin and Hobbes comic) when the test involved is an ethics test. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/nyregion/01columbia.html?ref=eduation[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/nyregion/01columbia.html?ref=eduation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>I find that very amusing, but I agree wholeheartedly to the supposition that people care more about the ends than the means. Society is very goal-oriented, and success is ultimately what everyone wants in life. To these grad students, at that age, success means passing a course and get a masters in journalism. I think that it was immoral what they did (or may have not done), but I think many people would cheat, in some sense of the word, in their own situations in order to achieve their own goals.</p>

<p>How is this for a theory. There was no cheating incident. The Prof wants to teach the class a lesson in journalistic ethics as they suffer through the press coverage of a rumor.</p>

<p>beprepn - to the credit of Columbia faculty and administration, this incident may indeed turn out to be a valuable lesson in academic and professional integrity:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/nyregion/03columbia.html[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/nyregion/03columbia.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>As a one time tenure track faculty at a school that terminated me the second week into my teaching career for not assuring all my MBA students that they would pass my class in Decision Sciences, I can testify that some schools (and maybe many schools) have lower ethical standards than the students that attend classes. Columbia is to be congratulated for doing something about this possible problem.</p>

<p>Not surprise I have seen several students cheat in my classes. Also one of my profs told us about several students who were caught cheating on an “Ethics” paper, they went and bought the papers online.</p>

<p>Nothing like cheating on an ethics test at a prestigious ivy to make the issue of academic integrity news worthy. It is a good news story, though - especially because cheating and plagarism cases have become all too commonplace these days. The way in which Columbia handles this case is important because it just might influence how other educational institutions deal with cheaters and plagarists. </p>

<p>Most college students do take honor codes seriously and value the intrinsic worth of their education enough not to cheat. Unfortunately, even with honor codes in place, grade grubbing and cheating these days is on the rise - and often it didn’t begin in college. At my kids’ high school cheating is rampant. Teachers try to stop it and threaten students with zeros on tests, zeros for the term, as well as suspension from school, but they are basically stymied in their efforts to stop it and frustrated because so many of these same students have poor analytical and reasoning skills - and, in some cases, it may even explains why a student’s SAT scores don’t gibe with grades. </p>

<p>Recently,Inside Higher Ed. ran a good article on this subject: “Traffic School for Essay Thieves”</p>

<p>

</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/11/29/plagiarism[/url]”>http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/11/29/plagiarism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>200 students in a graduate class with a computer based final? Hummmmmmm!</p>