<p>Oh then that was one of the three that I omitted</p>
<p>Also, the writing block guy he said that his “poem was long well at least not yet” to qualify a atatement? </p>
<p>@lifeishard if humorous something was a choice I think i put that.</p>
<p>Yeah it was a qualification</p>
<p>@DAIMYO
Yes, because the statement was necessarily true so he had to say that it work in progress.</p>
<p>what were the other options for the essay one</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the answer to the deadly and lethal question? And also for the free rider question I believe its potentially altruistic. The passage stated that free riders definitely EXIST which doesn’t equate to they are easy to detect. The whole theme of passage one is that free riding(putting one’s objectives over others) can end up benefiting others while passage 2 refutes this by saying individual desires don’t always build up to shared goals.</p>
<p>Ok so anyone here to back me up? The question asked which MUST be TRUE…
It CAN NOT be EQUAL to 96… Remember the questions ASKS for which MUST be true. If the ETS says that even one word will change the result of the answer apparently they messed up themselves.
I just thought since E wasn’t true the only reasonable one would be D. </p>
<p>the essay one was not humorous</p>
<p>@jackytang23 THANK YOU! YES SAME PAGE HERE</p>
<p>should we email college board? even if it means 10 points more for me, i’ll take it</p>
<p>@spark423
It was because she was" superior in competition"
The free rider one i felt it was “more obvious” because, he said “there are def some out there.” He stated that theses people can be benefited If lets say I gave you a “tool” u were able to finish ur pro but i also benefitted in someway b/c we both worked on the same pro. But yes, potentialy altruistic is viable too.</p>
<p>@scarlettlovesivy Do it!</p>
<p>idk there knuckleheads…</p>
<p>ahh i’m scared to lmao (i know i said would sue them but i’m all talk :)) )</p>
<p>@scarlettlovesivy
Also the gymnast thought that the big tall guy her coach was “unremarkable” right because he was “just” a tall guy?Rite</p>
<p>@spark423 I actually found the free-riders passage online from a book lol, and it says “shirking is immediately apparent”. Idk if CB made any changes to the passage but I doubt it. So yeah, it should be obvious even though I didn’t choose that 
</p>
<p>@scarlettlovesivy YES!!! YOU WITH ME TOO??? I think we should talk to college board about it too. another faulty question i think they have is
“Seats five,” he said, and looked at us appreciatively, as if to congratulate us on being a family of exactly five. "Come on, Kids, he said. “Get in and show your mom and dad how much space you’ve got.”
If you reread it he’s being more confident than anything else. Reason is because the car seats “EXACTLY FIVE” and “SHOW YOUR MOM AND DAD HOW MUCH ROOM YOU GOT” he is not being obsequious in any way (not being servile or flattering them). If you read the first line it says he looks at them “appreciatively” and “congratulate” them. He’s kind of confident that they will buy the car. He’s not kissing up to them in any way:) Why would a car dealer APPRECIATE them and CONGRATULATE them if he’s not confident that they will buy the car?
Also
genial and ingratiating
bootlicking and obsequious both sounds right also
they are putting synonyms after synonyms as answer choices…correct me if i’m wrong</p>
<p>@lifeishard Yep, unremarkable is right</p>
<p>@sodone
So i am right? about the"Obvous thing?"
thanks</p>