***Oct 2014 SAT (US ONLY)***

<p>Also what was the squirrel question again? I totally forget about that one…</p>

<p>@justmetaphor you are bae</p>

<p>Yo i just really wanna see my score. </p>

<p>If you don’t buy that score report, does that mean you won’t get to know how many you got wrong, and how many you omitted?</p>

<p>No. You’ll be able to see how many you got wrong and what difficulty level they were.</p>

<p>Less than or equal to 96 is correct answer. Because OR condition has to satisfy at least one not both (X is less than 96 OR X is equal to 96)</p>

<p>Can someone predict my score???
-5 CR
-0 Math
-3 Writing 8 essay </p>

<p>Actually, @uthdad‌, even when both parts of an or statement are true, it’s still true, but only one is required… Logically speaking. You would have to say explicitly not both. (A v B) & ~(A & B) </p>

<p>@neatoburrito‌ could you please articulate/explain what you me a little more? I’m trying to understand this question too :/</p>

<p>@neatoburrito is correct; the question as written is perfectly valid.</p>

<p>@claren‌
CR: 730-750
M: obvy
W: 680-700</p>

<p>2210-2250 nice!</p>

<p>@neatoburrito‌. You are correct. You explained it better. </p>

<p>so how easy is it to get a 10 for the essay ??? especially with this prompt.</p>

<p>I got a 6 for a one page essay that did nothing except restate the prompt, so I don’t think it’ll be too hard if you wrote two pages.</p>

<p>@icepierre‌
The difference lies in the use of words rather than symbols. In mathematical symbols x < 96 means that x is all numbers to the left of 96 BUT NOT INCLUDIING 96. (open number on the number line graph, dotted line on xy plane; whereas </= allows the inclusion of 96 in the solution set. </p>

<p>The question did not use </=. It used words. In particular it used what’s known as a disjunction in logic. One or both. A or B. A v B. The only way this kind of statement can be false is if both are false.<br>
<a href=“Logical disjunction - Wikipedia”>http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>The mathematical symbols imply “not both” because it is mathematically impossible for a single value to be both less than AND equal. But this is an issue with math, and why I prefer to stick with the study of logic. It is also why ETS chose to use words. There is no implication in formal logic. </p>

<p>SAT math is essentially a reading test. </p>

<p>Was this question towards the end of a section? </p>

<p>Does anyone remember the last sentence error question for the first grammar section and what you put?</p>

<p>Remember the question about the 4 numbers and 20? Was the average of the 5 numbers 14 or 15? </p>

<p>anyone taking the november SAT… lol</p>

<p>It was toward the end, but it did use the symbol less than or equal to.</p>

<p>Ugh… i think i got -4 on CR and and i changed two of my answers last minute… if im predicting rigt i couldve had a 800 -_- Hoping its a 760 again like it was in june and that i didnt get more wrong</p>