<p>GUYS CHILL OUT WE CAN’T SEND YOU THE DOC BECAUSE IT DOESN’T ALLOW US TO AND BESIDES CONSIDER YOURSELVES LUCKY FOR NOT HAVING IT BC IT’S STRESSFUL AF TO LOOK AT IT </p>
<p>What scores have you all gotten in the past?</p>
<p>@uclabound1 </p>
<p>2110 Oct 2013
2150 Mar 2014
2200+ expected this test</p>
<p>I also hope for 2200+ for this test, but this forum is causing me to question everything. </p>
<p>2090 in the past, hoping for 2300+ this time</p>
<p>Can someone grade me based on what I saw?
Math: 7/8 omit CR: 6 or 7 wrong Writing: 2 omit, 2/3 wrong</p>
<p>Go to the score predictions Thead and ask</p>
<p>@Karnier I picked the mistaken thinking, but you have a point… crap. Only thing I can come up with is that he didn’t seem to be criticizing as much as just pointing it out… Oh god.</p>
<p>That noise over there? That is the sound of my 800 in critical reading slowly dying :(</p>
<p>Here is the passage:</p>
<p>“There is another reason why I think taste taste is overrated. We are accustomed to experiencing flavor as a singular sensation in the mouth. As a result, we the use the words “taste” and “flavor” interchangeably in casual conversation. This makes it easy to forget that flavor is actually a fusion of taste and smell, and that the apparent simplicity of flavor is just an illusion, one that is somtimes (sic) reinforced by language.”</p>
<p>Reading the passage, it seems like he’s pointing out mistaken thinking that LEADS to errors in diction. And he’s not really criticizing the errors. Any other thoughts? </p>
<p>I definitely think that’ll be a level 5 question though. Lotsa tricky questions on this test when I think about it.</p>
<p>@Mystic7 @Karnier I’m pretty sure the mistaken thinking question referred to the part where Carl Sagan and some other person said that smell has practically no use in our lives, so the author would most definitely consider this as mistaken thinking. I think “criticize the pervasiveness of an error” might’ve been a choice for another question.</p>
<p>You may be right, but I think that part of the passage did had a question with answers that sounded similar to “point out the prevalence of mistaken thinking” vs “criticize the pervasiveness of an error in diction”</p>
<p>Agh… I don’t know why I even care since it’s too late to change my answer at this point.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I actually don’t recall that sagan question, but this was also one that I had trouble on. </p>
<p>No, it was neither. The answer was 12.5 not 14 or 15 lol.</p>
<p>@alldaboston neither, the average was 12.5 not 14 or 15. lol. simple arithmetic equation.</p>
<p>@uthdad no youre incorrect. The question said there was 10 DIFFERENT positive integers between 1 and 100 inclusive. However, It had to be greater than or equal to 6. Yes, 6. Because any of the integers could not be negative, the least value in that set could only be 1. Therefore, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 is 10 integers and 6 is the median (m). It cannot be less than 6 otherwise it wouldn’t be the median. </p>
<p>@meaa7130
K, I didn’t know they had that. </p>
<p>@ChubbyPanda111 The median of the integers you listed is actually 5.5. </p>
<p>@neatoburrito @justmetaphor i disagree. The correct answer is greater than or equal to 6. IT specifically said 10 different positive INTEGERS between 1-100 inclusive. No variables are considered there. 6 HAS to be the least possible median here. They all have to be different. the numbers that precede it can only be 1,2,3,4,5. It cannot dip below 1 because it would not be positive and below 0 would be negative which doesn’t satisfy the conditions. Thus, the correct answer was the last one. Greater than or equal to 6.</p>
<p>Question:</p>
<p>Was the graph and passage about spring peepers experimental?</p>
<p>oh crap. you’re right. Guess I misread the question and got that one wrong. However, people have said that that question and the folded paper question are faulty. Thoughts?</p>