<p>Wait what are we arguing about?</p>
<p>@sat2014 You should be that kid who takes it 5 times lol. You HAVE to take it with us in November!</p>
<p>@Mystic7 Which question was the rarity answer?</p>
<p>@icepierre haha no way. I already got rid of my SAT books. Only think I have left is my actual PSAT from junior year XD October was my final time. If I dont get an 1800 however… you never know :O</p>
<p>It was in response to this: The times when he ‘could
not’ work grew commoner and commoner. Of all types of human being, only the artist
takes it upon him to say that he ‘cannot’ work. </p>
<p>Another answer was “gamut of possible reactions”</p>
<p>I was the kid who took it 5 times 
I don’t want a 6th </p>
<p>you knowthe qualifying question? what other anser options went with qualifying</p>
<p>Pretty sure I put scope of an undertaking but idk</p>
<p>I thought “scope of an undertaking” was also an answer to that question, but not sure. And maybe “working definition” and “humorous inquiry” as well</p>
<p>working definition but its wrong. i checked. i got it wrong. its qualify a statement. castigations what are your prior SAT scores?</p>
<p>I’m not sure if this math q was addressed earlier in this thread… But was one of the answers “cannot be determined from given info”</p>
<p>Perhaps he WOULD work; for a little while, anyway. He rummaged in the litter of
papers. Where was that passage he had been working on yesterday? The poem was an
immensely long one—that is, it was going to be immensely long when it was finished—
two thousand lines or so, in rhyme royal, describing a day in London.</p>
<p>it might actually be a working definition idk what i put</p>
<p>taking the sat for four/ five times? Isn’t that really bad? idk if I should take another one lol…</p>
<p>Uhh 700 M, 700 W, 580 CR (June 2014)
Worked really really really hard to bring that 580 to a 750+, and 700 to 800 (doubting I got 750+ on M with all my dumb mistakes)</p>
<p>Before that I had 550 CR, 660 M, and 680 W (March 2014)</p>
<p>First time SAT was 580 CR, 630 M, 550 W (Jan 2014)</p>
<p>Expecting 750+ CR, 700-720 M, and 750+ W with these two October tests I took :)</p>
<p>Those are some pretty impressive scores. Good job on the improvement. It’s not a working definition. look up what a working definition is. Makes no sense for that question. I’ll admit I got that one wrong. hopefully I can make up 4 it by getting the rarity of an attitude correct</p>
<p>idk i think i put qualifying or working def. really hope the former</p>
<p>I honestly forgot what I put on that question… I knew I changed it, or I was really hung up on it</p>
<p>I’m positive it was mark</p>
<p>Actually i could be wrong idk mark seemed right at the time though but i can understand the argument for sensation, i was between the two but picked mark</p>
<p>i also think i changed my answer i hate my life</p>
<p>Lol because of that question im probably at -4 CR which is what i had last time so no improvement in CR… but still hoping i didnt make any more math mistakes and definitely got -2</p>