<p>I put obvious</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the question/answer to the two circles and the shaded part in the middle?</p>
<p>@Busybee123 it was definitely <= 96 cuz all the medians u can possible get fit in that category
and it said inclusive im 100% positive</p>
<p>Also for the “easily controlled” question about the toolbox:</p>
<p>it is “cut quickly” because the sentence read sharp, cutquickly, and easily controlled.
sharp and easily controlled serve as adjectives. Cut quickly is not thus it lacks parallel structure.</p>
<p>I put inherently useful because it says how at the end it actually ends up being a win-win situation. It’s not potenitally altruistic bc POTENTIALLY? idk free riding is not altruistic. Anyone else put inherently useful?
also for the essay one, i put the long and something task or something like that (directly stated from passage) </p>
<p>Also I got 4 no errors, does anyone else second that? </p>
<p>@scarlettlovesivy I got 4 no errors as well</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the one about how many people had both pickup trucks and cars? I put 28</p>
<p>I put 28 too</p>
<p>I put confident and measured for the sonny tone</p>
<p>3 no errors for identifying sentence errors. the actress, the electrical appliances, and the squirrel. the only way that is strongly being debating is the stress one. it’s either FROM or no error. i put from for that one. anyone remember the one before question 11 on writing? it was the one before the fireplace. I left it the same(AS)</p>
<p>I put flattering and obsequious but I think it’s either genial and ingratiating or confident and measured</p>
<p>guys for the toolbok one its no error. all 3 were adjectives. anyways that may be a waste section ofr me cause i had 3 sections for writing</p>
<p>@alison12 no it should be no error because it said seem to anticipate… so that needs will. are doesnt work</p>
<p>@busybee123 i have a feeling u may be right cause i put no error for that. I am hoping that is a waste section. so fari i have l ike 1-2 wrong but still need an 780 at last. </p>
<p>and i had an extra section of writing</p>
<p>Oh when I went on earlier it was very empty, but now it’s good</p>
<p>@busybee123 squierrel one was DEFINETELY no error</p>
<p>it was an error, its easily controlled.
it’s supposed to be sharp, cut quickly and ARE easily controlled.
but i dont know if this was the squirrel one though</p>
<p>did some digging. I’m done taking the SAT(4th time hoping for that elusive 1800 :D) if you guys want more practice, i found the May 2013 SAT <a href=“http://easyabroad.com.cn/downloads/2013年5月北美SAT考试真题.pdf”>http://easyabroad.com.cn/downloads/2013年5月北美SAT考试真题.pdf</a> enjoy</p>
<p>Okay can someone explain whther the triangle/square question was 135 or 120? There were two different ways to calculate the answer and both yielded different results</p>