October 14 SAT

<p>How’d you guys think it was?</p>

<p>I though the Math and Writing were pretty easy, but the Critical Reading hard. CR is always my weak point though.</p>

<p>I’m pretty sure I got all the sentence completions correct. But the passages, no. Especially that Thoreau one. Anyone remember some of the answers for that one? I remember a good deal of the SCs.</p>

<p>which ones do you remember. i thought the vocab was hardd… especially for the last few</p>

<p>I think I did better than I did in June.</p>

<p>I remember… diaphanous, iconoclast, supercilious, currency/inconculsive… Can anyone job my memory with some of the questions or possible choices?</p>

<p>i got the same ones as you did except supercilious but i’m probably wrong</p>

<p>i had a hard time with the SC dealing with policies. i think the answer choices were “mitigated…jingoism” and “ossified…bureaucrization.”</p>

<p>i got ossified.bureaucritation (or w.e) :p</p>

<p>For that I put ossified because it was saying that something became rigid?</p>

<p>And did you guys get altered/revolution for one? I wasn’t sure on that…</p>

<p>wow sentence completions were awful.
i dont have a good vocabulary, clearly.
and i have like, none of those answers. =(</p>

<p>i got “ossified…bureaucrization” for that one. and i got all of the above ones the same too, including supercilious, which im pretty sure was right.</p>

<p>hmm i said the legislation one?</p>

<p>I remember… diaphanous, iconoclast, supercilious, currency</p>

<p>this is exactly what i had, but i was just guessing lol based on eliminatoin</p>

<p>math…pretty good
cr…had a few tricky questions, ok besides that
wirting…ok, my essay it think it isnt great</p>

<p>yeah, that’s what i put.</p>

<p>with<em>one</em>voice, damn i don’t think i put currency/inconclusive. i put credence/irrefutable. am i wrong?</p>

<p>Yep I put ossified/bureaucrazation, supercilious, iconoclast…</p>

<p>I put anomalous for the one where it was like “virtually transparent” and the other hard vocab was diaphanous</p>

<p>Maybe that one was our experimental…</p>

<p>I put currency/inconclusive… i guessed there was another weird def. or interpretation of currency… for credence irrefutable, the evidence was in support of it, so it couldn’t be irrefutable</p>

<p>yea it was currency/inconclusive</p>

<p>what examples did you guys use on your essays?</p>

<p>Diaphonous was the transparent one.</p>

<p>i think it was iconoclast since the senetence was about breaking tradition(guessed on that one!!)</p>

<p>iconoclast is correct.</p>