<p>My experience was actually kinda pleasant, lol. Except the cafeteria was freeeezing.</p>
<p>Histrionics; haha
I never even used my calculator thoughh.</p>
<p>i dont trust myself enough to not use a calculator. I’d probably make some stupid mistake like 1+3 = 5</p>
<p>haha my proctor was my middle school history teacher…
and he was also my proctor for cty sat back in 7th grade
for sat ii bio
for sat ii math
for sat ii world history
and now psat</p>
<p>i hope he’s a good luck charm</p>
<p>I just keep my calculator for backup, mostly I don’t use it. Some of the programs I’ve got come in handy though. ;)</p>
<p>I wouldn’t have had the time to put anything in my calculator! :P</p>
<p>Honestly, I think I just was a bit nervous. When practicing writing sections at home, I score very high, but today on the PSAT, I can’t believe the ambiguity errors and verb tense errors I missed…</p>
<p>What ambiguity errors? Though I agree there were a lot of verb tense errors? How many No Errors did you get? I only got 2…</p>
<p>Freakin’ Easter Islanders. Why’d they have to go and topple those statues?!</p>
<p>For the strength/flexibility question in critical reading passage about stars and shapes, the answer was strength.
The answer choices were “strength of the brain’s response” or “flexibility of the mind.”</p>
<p>the passage focused on the responses of the brain to shapes not the flexibility of the brain.</p>
<p>I promised myself I’d stop thinking about it, but which no errors did you guys get? I had two - the manuscripts/long since lost one and something about Cesar Chavez. Overall the writing section was ok except for the stupid no error section…</p>
<p>I had no errors aplenty.</p>
<p>The cone shaped eggs, the school of fish, the vice president’s house one, the manuscripts, cesar chavez…</p>
<p>Oh I was only referring to those with five underlined terms…I wasn’t accounting for the improving sentences no errors.</p>
<p>I had about 5 no errors.</p>
<p>^^^ I got no error for the vice president and cesar chavez ones. Can’t remember the specifics of the others.</p>
<p>I only had 2-3 no errors for the underlined bits.</p>
<p>^wasn’t the cone-shaped eggs improving sentences, but yeah that was A?</p>
<p>anyways I got school of fish and vice president’s house and I think it was alternating? I guess I got the Cesar Chavez wrong…
</p>
<p>Wait was school of fish also Improving sentences? then it might be possible I got the Cesar Chavez one right. Was it the first on on the second page on Identifying Sentence Errors?</p>
<p>Ambiguity errors? Do you mean like pronouns? I don’t remember any of those.</p>
<p>Hmm, I don’t really distinguish the two in my head, nor did I count my No Errors 
ehh…</p>
<p>That reminds me… how could ETS put ‘gerrymandering’ on the test? Honestly!</p>
<p>i had like 4-5 no errors…not much</p>