October 2010 Complied Answer Key for the International SAT

<p>Feel free to post answers to the October International SAT .</p>

<p>Since the test is similar to March 2008 SAT: </p>

<p>SENTENCE COMPLETION

  • unaffected***
  • conundrum
  • admirer/declined
  • diffident
  • ineffective against/not exceed
  • flourish/central
  • pristine/quixotic
  • inquisition</p>

<p>ROBERT FROST

  • satisfied about eluding question
  • extend (to what degree)
  • amount (measure)
  • letters confirmed suspicion</p>

<p>POLITICAL

  • articifical construct***
  • gross understatement
  • statistical data
  • challenges the underlying assumption
  • negative connotation***</p>

<p>MOTHER’S BOX

  • marigold reminded of bad memories
  • more comfortable with kids
  • wrestling showed intensity
  • recognized error in ways
  • mother felt item still belonged to her
  • disapproved yet sympathetic
  • direct narrative</p>

<p>DECOMPOSITION

  • playfully skeptical
  • teacher
  • meticulous
  • pulverized
  • statement to make a change
  • unconventional way to introduce scientific idea***
  • importance of natural decomposition</p>

<p>PASSIONATE LETTER-WRITING GUY

  • overwrought
  • universal truth</p>

<p>BOTANIST

  • versatile***</p>

<p>COMPUTER TRANSLATION

  • more optimistic
  • less effective than hoped to be</p>

<p>thanks
anything for the writing section?</p>

<p><bump> 10 char</bump></p>

<p>What was the math answer for that question with x, m, t and d?</p>

<p>Other threads suggest it might be x=m-t-d but i remember the question saying d subtracted from x. Wouldn’t that mean x= m-t+d ?</p>

<p>I’m horrible at math.</p>

<p>It’s m-t-d. :)</p>

<p>x=m-t-d
10 char</p>

<p>yeah m-t-d</p>

<p>also was the asnwer to the math question about the chip’s multiplying 256?
and they typist thing-13.33?</p>

<p>^Both of your answers are correct :)</p>

<p>thanks!! :)</p>

<p>hey does anyone remember if the answers of the first 6 questions were all Bs (or at least 5 out of the 6 questions) for one of the CR sections?</p>

<p>yeah, a lot of bs on section 2 or 3 i guess (the first reading section)</p>

<p>yeah something like that-not sure of the number though! :)</p>

<p>Yes I’ve seen lots of Bs somewhere.</p>

<p>thanks guys :slight_smile: i’m from hong kong and i just learned abt this website…i never knew there’re ppl who know the correct answers right after the test and what score to expect…i have a few doubts on my mind and i’m hoping you can clear them for me…

  1. for the flourish…central question, anyone remember the sentence (not necessarily the exact wording) and what is the word paired with peripheral?
  2. for the political passage, there’s one question that asks abt the diff between passage 1 and 2…the answer’s ‘challenges the underlying assumption’…i got that right but is there another question that asks ‘what was supported by BOTH passages?’
  3. is there a sentence completion Q which involves these pairs of choices ‘slovenly + internalize’, ‘emulate + immaculate’? is it on the experimental section? cos i reli don’t recall coming across these words lol
  4. what do you guys expect the CR curve to be like? if i get 4Qs wrong, what score should i be expecting for CR?
    Thanks loads :)</p>

<p>Was there a SC with the word ‘tirade’? Was it in the ‘inquisition’ question?</p>

<p>I still think for the decomposition passage that the “rocks eat plants” is a shocking conclusion and not a way to introduce a scientific subject. Can anyone explain to me exactly why that should be the answer?</p>