October 2011 SAT General Discussion

<p>that’s probably experimental</p>

<p>and New Zealand one was change had been to has been right? (A)</p>

<p>@akram see post 995</p>

<p>so vehement vs caustic for the nuke passage?</p>

<p>what was the nuke one about? I remember vehement and caustic, but not nuke</p>

<p>What was answer to ella question asking about what most of passage talked about:
it was like her personality, political philosophy, writing, background…i put political philosophy and why is the answer ameloriate for MLK…i put elaborate because wouldnt it make sense to “develop or present” (elaborate) social injutice in different ways than ameloriate or make it better</p>

<p>The answer to that one is political philosophy.</p>

<p>When do we get our results?</p>

<p>I also put political philosophy :)</p>

<p>ohhh i put political philosophy too.</p>

<p>Scores should come out on the 20th/21st depending on your timezone.</p>

<p>i put political too</p>

<p>what was the New Zealand writing one? was it A or C?</p>

<p>But how come answer was ameliorate and not elaborate and how come it wasnt the stimulating one but it was compelling/formulaic</p>

<p>@Ashokpara14
theres no consensus on the new zealand question</p>

<p>That’s really fast</p>

<p>@any5302003… could you find it and paste it for me or explain it to me? cuz i don’t see it anywhere</p>

<p>Peopler’s saying that when should be that in “It wan’ts until xxx when xxxx” although I put no error :0</p>

<p>Yup, it was 9</p>

<p>It’s like something drew the people … I’m using my iPod to view this… It’d be a pain to find it… Sorry</p>

<p>What was the question for the “Compelling formulaic” answer?</p>

<p>Also I put powerful…something for the debater one</p>