<p>you should look up the definition of inscrutable.</p>
<p>[inscrutable</a> - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary](<a href=“http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/inscrutable]inscrutable”>http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/inscrutable)</p>
<p>Exhaustive is a better word than edifying, but I didn’t (and still don’t) think inscrutable fit at all.</p>
<p>Inscrutable doesn’t fit at all, which is why it’s completely wrong no matter what the second part of the answer choice is.</p>
<p>@heaven - a derisive comment is not only mocking but contemptuous. i thought
the comment was more on the playful side than the seriously insulting side.</p>
<p>zen…</p>
<p>inscrutable would not work at all.</p>
<p>its pedestrian and edifying.</p>
<p>Okay.</p>
<p>10 char.</p>
<p>Inscrutable would not WORK AT ALL? And edifying does? Lol. Whatever.</p>
<p>I guess we’ll see Choklit. To me it seemed a little more than playful</p>
<p>10 char?</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>the minimun requirement for a post is 10 characters.
When there are less than 10 characters, just type some random text.
like</p>
<p>arnba’rnb’reban’lrb</p>
<p>to make it 10+ chars :P</p>
<p>wow…this is the biggest SAT thread i have seen in like a year
this thing is HUGE!!</p>
<p>If you cut all the spam, it wouldn’t be that big lol</p>
<p>oh yeah i put humourous. i didnt really think it was that but by process of elimination…</p>
<p>Zen- do you really think conventional writing is inscrutable? You must have a lot of trouble reading :p</p>
<p>Careless mistakes happen to the best of us.</p>
<p>What were the full answer choices for derisive vs. humorous. The answer is obviously not clear based on just those words.</p>
<p>i put humorous. and i think thats right. but idk for sure.</p>
<p>I can’t remember exactly but there was a question on a previous QAS thats very similar to the pedestrian Q. It went like Her books were traditional, even ____, and the answer was inscrutable. That’s what threw me off on this question. Traditional writing can be hard to understand, everyone knows that. I still don’t see how edifying means comprehensive.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the choices were all just a single word.</p>
<p>perhaps the answer wasn’t meant to be comprehensive but simply that it teaches.</p>
<p>The way I saw it:</p>
<p>Exhaustive > Edifying
Pedestrian > Inscrutable
Edifying > Inscrutable</p>
<p>Conventional and inscrutable just don’t match.</p>
<p>Well considering that traditional =/= conventional…</p>