She had this whole thing with le chatelier’s prinpicle that made perfect sense and I completely guessed so I thought she was right
@cocolover123
I’m pretty sure the IMF one was right at the top of the back of the next page. You may not have seen it.
@apactstudent I’m pretty sure it was not at the top of the back of the next page. If I didn’t see it, and a bunch of people didn’t either, I must be dumb.
My teacher just emailed back and said that’s a real problem and I’m not the first person who’s emailed him about it. 
What did you all got for 2©? I thought it was a little tricky because they you had to convert to kj
@Kitsyxoxo Same Le chatelier all the way lol…
© deltaH = 45.5kJ/mol
deltaS = .126kJ/Kmol
deltaG = deltaH - TdeltaS
deltaG = 45.5kJ/mol - 298K(.126kJ/Kmol)
deltaG = 7.952
7.952 = -RT ln K
7.952 = -(.0821)(298)lnK
K = .723
deltaG is positive and K<1 so thermodynamic data for the reaction supports the student’s claim
So, how is CollegeBoard going to address this issue of some people having some parts to the question and others not? Because the people who didn’t have those extra parts received more time to work on the other parts, thereby putting us people who did have all the parts at a disadvantage.
Very true…I didn’t consider that
@whatisthepurpose Do you think they would take that since G is positive, it is not thermodynamically favored so k must be less than 1
@Wannabenerd1 My teacher said that exact thing, and he said the most likely action will be they will drop those questions during grading because of such the controversy surrounding them. Even if we didn’t “see” them, according to some people, that is a LOT of people having more time for other things and not answering the other ones, so they would just drop them based on all the controversy about it. It’s too many people not doing something or not being able to.
excellent point though. I am sure everything will turn out alright.
@Wannabenerd exactly my point
No offense, but I’m pretty sure that those of you that “didn’t have those questions” simply didn’t see it. It doesn’t make sense that those questions would be experimental because the total point value wouldn’t be /46 like it was last year. Also, the experimental questions are on the MC, 10 of them are experimental and are basically thrown out (whether or not you got them right) so your mc score is conveniently /50 (no scaling). It also doesn’t make sense that they made a mistake in printing, because all or none of them would have the same mistake (assuming they did some sort of mass printing and printed everything at the same time, which is the most logical thing to do).
also, i got lik 61.0 percent yield, which most people probably got lik 60.8%. I did 2.64/4.33=61.0 when i should have done 2.64/4.34=60.8. Will they not count my answer right?
Can somebody please raise the concern that the people who did have the extra part are at a disadvantage to College Board? I really could have done better if I had more time.
@pillowspillows No offense but I’m going to allow collegeboard to handle this. Thank you for your opinion, though. Gonna have to check our glasses guys HAHA.
@Wannabenerd1 Yes don’t worry I am already on it ! You should send one as well because the more about it, the better.
I’m writing it right now and instead of saying people on college confidential, cuz that would be odd, i’ll say my fellow classmates from other schools.
@wannabenerd totally agree with you they should just readminister the free response to everyone who had form O bc it’s unfair both ways
At the same time, if they throw the questions out, they’ll throw it out for everyone so those of you who had to put the time and do it would not have it against you in scores.
Personally I think collegeboard should just drop the issue and give us all 5s 
gosh I need to study for apush too
Omg something like this happened for AP Spanish at my school. they had to readmin a whole exam because collegeboard accidentally mixed up the tapes that recorded their oral presentations. It was awful.
@c0llegeb0und2468 Ah I wish