<p>Hoping for a 4. Ugh can’t wait til July.</p>
<p>I’m going nuts wondering what I made. I’m sure I made a 4, but I’d really like a 5… That way there’s no way my ex made a higher score than I did, plus I get on my the teacher’s “wall of 5s” lol… And he hates me. =P</p>
<p>Would pay an exorbitant sum to know what I made.</p>
<p>Ok, so hypothetically if there were a question regarding a spoiled tuna sandwich and the initial illness as being the UCS, UCR, CS, CR, or NS, which would you guys choose? I chose NS but I still have no idea if I’m right. :/</p>
<p>^Ah that happened to me once, I ate a spoiled tuna sandwich once, then became ill(initial illness), but months later I ate a fresh one,but then became suddenly sick. I think my initial illness would have been an UCR ( Unconditional Response )</p>
<p>Psychology wasn’t that hard. Art History was tougher imo</p>
<p>That second FRQ continues to be discussed! So, theoretically speaking, of course:
- A breach of confidentiality (reporting names) would be unethical, as would failing to debrief the participants, but I know not what debriefing entails so… the former is safer.
2)TWO variables would be a design flaw</p>
<p>I went witht he 1st route on my free response lol confidentiality .
eh feeling unsure now lol</p>
<p>According to Trevor Packer:</p>
<p>“Yes, the most frequently administered FRQs from Monday’s AP Exams will be posted at about 4 pm Eastern Time today.”</p>
<p>Can’t wait, although I don’t know if the answers will be posted as well. This proves though that there are different forms, and some people will never be able to see the FRQs, or the answers to them, that they had.</p>
<p>Yay FRQs are up!</p>
<p>Thanks for the update!</p>
<p>I didn’t have time to finish my 2nd part of the written…and my answer for the ethical issue is wrong…really hoping to get a 5…T.T</p>
<p>^What exactly did you put as a response to the ethics question? I do believe it was failure to debrief or a breach of confidentiality.</p>
<p>I hope the curve is generous. I got about 5/16 points in total on the free response.</p>
<p>@Athenaa @The8thline The ethical issue was a breach in confidentiality. Researchers are never supposed to disclose the names of the participants in their studies, nor can they reveal any other distinguishing features that could possibly identify a specific participant.</p>
<p>The ethical design flaw was revealing names so yeah confidentiality. The experiment design flaw was that it tested young people only 25 year olds for Group A and only 65+ for Group B, so it would have been better for a cross-sectional study to yield more meaningful results.</p>
<p>I dont think that was the experiment design flaw. Wasnt it that there were too many independent variables??</p>
<p>Man! I put debriefing as the ethical design flaw… DARN!</p>
<p>Hey for correlational research, the answer was that it does not imply causation right?</p>
<p>I said that even though a best fit line may be created with correlational research, it won’t be enough as it is just a relation. You need causation with experiments for full results.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t think that it’s enough to define the flaws. You have to explain how to correct the flaws.</p>
<p>It will completely come down to my multiple choice score to determine whether I get a 3 or a 4. I realize I totally bombed the free response section after looking back at the questions.</p>