<p>for the loui armstrong question what was the answer of the relationshpi of the two passages? i dont remember what i put but i remember i was down to two answers and i think i chose the higher up one. B i think?</p>
<p>@lolokcollege the green chem question on the study of green chem or something like dat </p>
<p>@lolokcollege The question that asked about another term for field, in the context of the passage.
@Mack23 Background may be synonymous with field in some instances but in the context of the passage discipline was definitely the most logical choice. The definition of discipline utilized for that question is a branch of study, or a “field” of study.</p>
<p>discpline doesnt work in the sentence</p>
<p>Look through the alternate definitions of discipline^</p>
<p>u could say the same for background</p>
<p>Field of definition was discipline.
It was definitely “fundamentally wrongheaded” because they contradicted each other</p>
<p>aw shat…okay. great i shall kiss away another 30 points.</p>
<p>seems like so far:
Math:
1 omit</p>
<p>W:
1 wrong
wrote 2 pages</p>
<p>Cr:
6 wrong</p>
<p>ASJAKDSADJDAKLF…seems like im taking the january one ASFJASKFJSAKFAJSFJSKJFAKJKSAF </p>
<p>@fireonice in the passage it stated that its not like business owners didnt try so its more reasonable. </p>
<p>is this considered a “hard” CR section for this SAT? im praying for a lenient curve…and does anybody know for math that could i get 1 omit but still an 800?</p>
<p>Green chemistry outline = ecological repercussions
Assimilation</p>
<p>Yeah, this CR kind of screwed with me as well this time. And @lolokcollege , you’re still looking at about a 2250-2300 if those estimates are accurate. And, yes, you do have a chance of getting an 800 with 1 omission. You’ll just have to get pretty lucky</p>
<p>@schoolisfunforme ok I don’t exactly remember the questions but I remember the two sides clearly contradicted each other. I’m pretty sure we had a consensus on this awhile back in the thread.</p>
<p>can someone explain the math interval one that was 4 pls!! :)</p>
<p>@lolokcollege I’m pretty sure -1 = 770</p>
<p>@fireonice but he did have a qualification in the passage. </p>
<p>@Mack23 the shabby vs weary one was in the passage with the girl’s aunt to come in to see that weird woman living in the “office” of her house or something.</p>
<p>Anyone know if that one was experimental?</p>
<p>@mdillon4 if you shifted the graph down 1 it intersected with the x axis at 4 points.</p>
<p>@mdillon4 u just shift the graph downward by 1 and count it hits the x axis 4 times</p>