<p>Math (somebody fill this in…and do one for wr. and cr)</p>
<p>800 = ?
750+ = ?
700+ = ?
650+ = ?
600+ = ?</p>
<p>i think maybe it was idiomatically incorrect bschenkel. i know i had that one marked as an error and some other people in the forum posted it as well, so i put it in the answers. can you remember the sentence? i know it was something about how the tax or something would be a disadvantage TO some people, but a benefit FOR others. thats why i marked it wrong. but i was not completely sure.</p>
<p>Yeah, lugubrious and 15. 0 is an integer.</p>
<p>Did anyone here NOT get a question that had 2 triangles, one inside another, with 100 as an answer</p>
<p>you’llsee, look at the january curve posted above.</p>
<p>i remember thinking that too, mrniceguy.</p>
<p>but i seem to remember that none of the choices corrected that, so i figured it must be ok. but gel is singular so it for sure has to be is and not are.</p>
<p>the cr section was very easy, as was writing…math was okay</p>
<p>if pt lying on the line is considered inside then it would have to be more than that, there would be 7 pts for just when x=0</p>
<p>Math was easy. Writing was easy. I hated CR. I probably got a little less than 750… AGAIN. It’s impossible to raise that CR score. I swear.</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>i heard this SAT was very hard compared to other test dates…anyone agree?<br>
Maybe a generous curve</p>
<p>andreaaaaaa-</p>
<p>yeah… I think I ended up putting D…something like “leaves for extracting a gel…”</p>
<p>not the best correction but avoids the “for whose” problem.</p>
<p>ooh…writing question:</p>
<p>it was like,
“the officials didnt like the new employees, even though they had the boards approval”
“they” was incorrect, right? since its an ambiguous pronoun?</p>
<p>I’ve taken the SAT before. This was extremely easy compared to December 2006’s test. That’s for sure.</p>
<p>i think i got 700+ cr…700+ wr (10 E)…and 650+ math</p>
<p>I hope/think I got: </p>
<p>760 Math
720 Writing (10 E)
730 CR (?This is questionable?)</p>
<p>“Whose” is fine for a non-person (animal, thing). (There is no analogous possessive form of “which.”) You can’t use “who,” however, to represent a non-person.</p>
<p>yeah zachsta. thats right.</p>
<p>the math section was easy…but i think i made several careless mistakes, anyone else think so?</p>
<p>i agree…</p>