<p>ooh…writing question:</p>
<p>it was like,
“the officials didnt like the new employees, even though they had the boards approval”
“they” was incorrect, right? since its an ambiguous pronoun?</p>
<hr>
<p>The error on that one came before that, I’m pretty sure. You only have like half the sentence there.</p>
<p>thats what i put.</p>
<p>no its def they.</p>
<p>Does anybody know what -6 on math would be?</p>
<p>My prediction:
Math: 780-800
Writing: 790-800
CR: 740-760</p>
<p>That would make my total 2310-2360 or 1520-1560</p>
<p>That may be way too optimistic, but so far I haven’t seen anything I got wrong in Math or Writing (I read the whole thread).</p>
<p>Maybe a little too optimistic.</p>
<p>yes…“they” was incorrect…amb. pronoun</p>
<p>i’m pretty optimistic about cr…i’m thinking 750+</p>
<p>again, biographer passage? anyone?</p>
<p>I put they for the answer, so I agree with ^^</p>
<p>6 on math would be 700+ (with semi-gently curve…i think) is this right?</p>
<p>ye this was much easier than march, in my opinion. I got destroyed on the CR with a 690. This is my VERY optimistic prediction</p>
<p>800 M
800 CR
700+ W (no way to predict)=2300+ </p>
<p>I haven’t counted any wrong for either m or cr yet which is why, and i have a pretty good feeling about both. Honestly, i could care less about the other two. I just want a good CR, since i already have a 780 math</p>
<p>-6 raw score [not questions] would be exactly 700.</p>
<p>I hope it is, you’llsee</p>
<p>um…i dont think thats right. That’s why too harsh. A -10 raw was a 690 in march</p>
<p>oh sry you’re talking about math…i was talking about cr…</p>
<p>For math? not CR</p>
<p>well, it all depends on the curve…let’s all pray that this test has the most generous curve in all of SAT history :)</p>
<p>i hope SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much that -1 will still be an 800 in math, and if it isnt it better be 790, none of this “were gonna jump from 800 to 780” cr*p</p>
<p>wut do you think -1 will be?</p>
<p>so what colleges did you guys send your scores to?</p>
<p>-1 = 780 this time. No doubt. It was WAY too easy to be -1 = 800. If we get lucky, 790.</p>
<p>-1 will definitely be 800…according to jan. curve</p>