<p>it was = 140.</p>
<p>is this the area of triangle prob? if so, it said area of rec EQUALS 140</p>
<p>wait so for the biography passages, the second one was talking about biographies of writers specifically? is that why it’s subset? i don’t remember that…</p>
<p>the first was broad rite? THATS all i remember</p>
<p>des it help talkin about the problems?</p>
<p>i think i would get nervous like most of you posting as a search for what others put for a question i cant go back and change.</p>
<p>but to each their own.</p>
<p>continue.</p>
<p>1) did anyone get passage 1 talking about novelists and passage 2 talking about biographers?
2) the math one about a) x…
b) y…
c) z…
greatest when :absolute value of
was it choice A or D?</p>
<p>it was A juventus, and i didnt get novelists/biographs</p>
<p>jjchase, the problem you were talking about was worded strangely. I remember thinking the same thing with the “above 140” but I also remember re-reading it and then making perfect sense out of it. It was poorly worded and confusing but nontheless we both got it right :-)</p>
<p>This is my first post but i normally just browse rather than partake. Does anyone recall the question regarding the number of factors (mc, answers where written words one two three…). I may have somehow gotten it wrong.</p>
<p>greatest common factor? was it 2<em>3</em>5?</p>
<p>lol. sorry im just not quite sure exactly. It was a multiple choice deeper in the section. I think it had to do with the possible values. It wasnt the 2/3 or the -2/3 or the 1/4. It was either an easy or medium question, straight up multiple choice.</p>
<p>someone may have said the answer was 4, but i thought i put three. Perhaps i just have a terrible memory after an abysmal 4.25 hours of suffering</p>
<p>It’s weird how these stop so suddenly</p>
<p>for the last one on the biography series was it that passage 1 would believe a claim made in passage 2 to be distorting the view?</p>
<p>If you mean passage 2 could be distorting the truth, I think so. That’s what I put.</p>
<p>and also the encyclopedia, did u guys get in that one paragraph he tried to discuss the variety of topics covered?
squids: a quotation stating a series of explanations for a specific phenomenon?</p>
<p>and also the tone of the first sentence in the biography passages was dismissive?</p>
<p>“and also the encyclopedia, did u guys get in that one paragraph he tried to discuss the variety of topics covered?”</p>
<p>I think that one was recalling childhood memories.</p>
<p>I can’t remember the others.</p>
<p>4 questions. </p>
<p>was the reading on privacy experimental?</p>
<p>does anyone know the other answer choices for the Elizabethan question besides spate and revival? I’m at a memory loss here and I didn’t know the meaning of spate and ruled out revival, but I forget what I put down.</p>
<p>can anyone explain why past historians weren’t “contemptuous of any definitive knowledge” by revising/creating records?</p>
<p>finally, can anyone tell me what this “narrow and biased” question asked exactly (something about history & literature)? I think I remember ruling that choice out but I can’t recall the question or other answers :/</p>
<p><em>^actually I think it was something like “contemptuous of any notion of definitive knowledge</em>” for my 3rd question there</p>