Yess @Entheogen . Btw for the final writing section there was a q with option with parks in it. The answer was just ‘parks’ right?
Yes @Rohan1998 . I remember that nothing else worked
Its park as not just park
Hmm I honestly doubt it. NONE of others made any sense to me.
No @Asutosh11 . That would be idiomatically incorrect.
@Entheogen Really? Because on the doc people were saying that “they can” was correct. I put “with” but I think “with” is incorrect.
No I mean it was with more ease and that’s what other people said a few pages back.
it was a lot of pages back
What about the math question x-18 or x-16???
@Kombeler The overwhelming consensus here is x - 18
@Argonian183 @schoolisfunforme the answer is than “they could with.” Just putting “with” is incorrect because it is not a full clause, and is not parallel; however, putting “they can” is incorrect twofold. Firstly, it does not imply subordination, and the sentence is clearly subordinated, and secondly, it needs a “with” to fulfill parallel structure.
by putting with doesn’t have to do with full clais. Go to page 45 of this discussion
@schoolisfunforme on page 45, ASAP concedes that it is either “with” or “they could with.” On 34, people explain that the answer is “they could with.” Clearly it is “than they could with.”
@flowerrrr sorry I can’t remember!
Anyone remember a question asking for the area of a shaded region bound by two graphs. There was a diagram. I got 4.5 anyone else?
yes it is 4.5
Does anyone remember the question with the answer mild exception or strong opposition? I think I may have forgotten to do the question and then all subsequent answers would be wrong. Please help - trying to decide if a I should cancel my scores.
The question was on the passages about DNA fingerprinting.
what score would i get if i got -3 or -4 on math
i believe it was strong oppositon