*Official May 6th SAT Discussion*

<p>Yeah that was question DEFINITELY did NOT make any appearance on my cheetah question set…</p>

<p>and the nitrogen DEFINETELY did not make it on my test… and i had only 2 writing sections</p>

<p>yeah i don’t recall nitrogen either…very strange…very very strange</p>

<p>did anyone get 3x/4 for an answer on the math?</p>

<p>It had something to do with ratios and finding the right representation of the amount given.</p>

<p>Yeah…i thought it was way too easy</p>

<p>it was like…x represents the amount of books. 3/4 are paperback (or something).how many paperbacks are there in terms of x?</p>

<p>so yeah… 3x/4</p>

<p>Yeah that particular question was like insulting to my intelligence. I studyed out of Barrons and they had me doin all sorts of crazy things, with fractions like that. Ridiculous.</p>

<p>Im ****ed off because I got 4-5 wrong. What mark range can I espect??? hoping for 710+.</p>

<p>Oh yeah…Of the 4-5 I got wrong 2 were grid-ins.</p>

<p>i think 700 is possible for that…but it’s gonna be close depending on the curve</p>

<p>Anyone remember what they put to that “The recently discovered photographs have been put up in a museum…”</p>

<p>yeah logistics</p>

<p>i was just skeptical because they threw a relatively easy question in pretty late in the order and I thought maybe I made a stupid mistake. </p>

<p>overall…</p>

<p>-Math was fair…I just hope I didn’t make any stupid mistakes.
-Reading was fair too…though I didn’t luck out with the sentence completion vocab words…and I did omit quite a few.
-Writing was probably fair also…but I couldn’t care enough about it so I just took it for the sake of completing it. I’ll just take my 730 from last time. =)</p>

<p>so yeah the test was fair to say the least.</p>

<p>Im predicting the curve will not be favorable. The math section was incredulously easy. Football players that only need a pass will score in the 600s for pete sake.</p>

<p>BTW Im a football player…and smart!!!Best Combo Ever!!</p>

<p>In addition to that “photographs in a museum” question, what’d you guys put for the bird that wasn’t particular about where it nested?</p>

<p>i think the birds question was A or B, don’t remember which one I put</p>

<p>What’d you say was wrong with it?</p>

<p>I put no error for that one… but I know that I probably got it wrong along with the plants question.</p>

<p>For the other sentence “Those who defend red wood trees justified their actions…”</p>

<p>What’d you put for that question?</p>

<p>“That’s what I put, chrisiskey. Because the author in the next paragraph then talks about those “implicit” claims and how he was unsure if they’d ever work anywhere but in idealistic minds.”</p>

<p>I put dismissive on that one. At first I thought skeptical, but then I read on and there were a few sentences that caused me to think “dismissive” generally, and I’m taking liberties with paraphrasing these sentences but this is how I simplified it:</p>

<p>These implicit claims are absolute crap.</p>

<p>If he were skeptical he would’ve been more like (meh, I’m not convinced).</p>

<p>If he were dismissive we would’ve been like, no way!</p>

<p>It was skeptical. He realizes that both the implicit and explicit claims provide a favorable middle ground. However, taken alone, he initially thinks it would’nt work, but you have to read the rest.</p>

<p>Mmmm…I tend to agree with waffle. The guy was just blowing off the claims instead of questioning them.</p>

<p>No…no…no It had BETTER be skeptical…I got enough questions wrong!!! </p>

<p>no one seems to know what the one is with the photographs though…</p>

<p>I don’t remember a photograph question…Either because I didn’t get it or because I forgot =p</p>

<p>No Twista, there was only one form of the test.</p>