<p>What were all the no error? Can someone just post the topic of each sentence?</p>
<p>The fact that they do have similar chromosomes shows their genetic linkage. They don’t look alike though. </p>
<p>It is definitely the genetic one… the article emphasizes on how corn basically appeared from nowhere and the only thing vaguely similar to it is tesotine and its similar in terms of chromosomes (genetics) and beyond that it is in no way similar which means there is no possible way that it could be considered a “variety of corn”</p>
<p>I have the same number of chromosomes as Obama, and i am a smaller less intelligent version of him. However I may have no genetic link to Obama himself. Understandably teosinte and corn are different species but the logic of having the same number of chromosomes stands. (Apes have a different number of chromosomes)</p>
<p>Moreover based on the explicit data given in the passage, it was clearly stated they have couldn’t discern any kinship between teosinte and corn. Same level of chromosomes doesn’t mean jack in terms of being LINKED. To the contrary, the data specifically said that teosinte is only an inch long and doesn’t have a protective husk so it’s less hardy. Whoever says genetic link is basing it off of Bryson, the author who concludes no genetic link</p>
<p>X^2-y was definetly -2 I remember checking like 3 times to make sure</p>
<p>@ChubbyPanda111 getting an 800 both times doesn’t mean you’re right. I don’t remember the exact question, but I remember checking it like 5 times, its -2</p>
<p>@collegetalk11 the article said that humans cultivated corn from teosinte, ie, corn came from teosinte. so even if it’s hard for scientists to tell that they are genetically linked, they definitely still are.</p>
<p>@collegetalk11 </p>
<p>You are analyzing it entirely wrong.</p>
<p>“Genetically, corn’s nearest relative is a wispy grass called teosinte, but beyond the level of chromosomes there is no discernible kinship.” </p>
<p>BEYOND the genetic level there is no obvious relationship.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>The answer is -2. We went over this before. I posted the exact steps a while back.</p>
<p>Can someone please post all the no error sentences please?</p>
<p>agreed @Chrysanthemum14 </p>
<p>“corn’s nearest genetic relative is teosinte” >> corn is genetically related to teosinte</p>
<p>pretty much as direct as you can get.</p>
<p>how did you guys get D for the supermarket one? I chose the answer with the biggest difference between the two prices but got a different answer</p>
<p>I got all three for the roman numeral, I don’t remember the first condition, but the second condition was that there was a difference of 2^n between any two terms which was true and the last one was true, but I cant remember, I think the sequence was like
3,5,9,17
All of them have a difference of 2^n 
</p>
<p>And yeah, I also got -2 for that one and checked over it too. Pretty sure it’s right </p>
<p>@joeythedog </p>
<p>It had nothing to do with the difference of prices. You just had to find the item that was cheaper in the supermarket than in the convenience store by looking at where the point was plotted.</p>
<p>No. Number two on the roman numeral stated that the difference between any two consecutive numbers in the sequence can be represented by 2^n
3,5,9,17
All can be represented by 2^n
I said that all numerals were correct.</p>
<p>It said the difference between any two can be represented by 2^n for some number n</p>
<p>If I am your kin, i am genetically related to you. If I am not your kin, I’m not genetically related to you. </p>
<p>that’s also quite direct </p>
<p>A sable antelope has 46 chromosomes and so does a human. That doesn’t mean squat in terms of whether we are linked or not.</p>
<p>@Chrysanthemum14 couldn’t that also be found by subtracting the x value from the y value? </p>
<p>No, two times the number, then minus 1</p>