<p>Does anyone remember “conception” as the first answer to a passage. Something like what does “view” mean in line 1. I wasn’t sure if it was “conception” because doesn’t that mean birth or something?</p>
<p>Sum33: I think we’re right.</p>
<p>i think i put conception too, but i’m not sure.</p>
<p>yeah conception definitely rings a bell… i believe that was the first question on the cities passage?</p>
<p>conception also has that meaning of grasping or comprehension</p>
<p>what were the other choices for this question</p>
<p>illusion… fantasy… things like that. definitely conception</p>
<p>there was also appiration…but I think that means ghost right?</p>
<p>i believe i put conception as well then cause didn’t it ask for what the scientists’ view of nature or sumthin’</p>
<p>oh yeah… apparition was E. but that was completely off</p>
<p>CONCENSUS ANSWERS SO FAR…</p>
<p>Sentence Completetion
–Subtle difference between willingness to <strong>NEGOTIATE</strong> and eagerness to make <strong>CONCESSIONS</strong>
–Dancer’s routine = DERIVATIVE & INEPT
–Material was so light as to be almost DIAPHANOUS
–Good policies are OSSIFIED by BEARUCRATIZATION
–The general was so disloyal, his name became synonymous with PERFIDY
–The photographer’s work was so simple, it was CANDID
–No one could fault the politician’s ELOCUTION
–The teacher disliked institutions, so as to be ICONOCLAST
–The advancements in electric lamps TRANSFORMED the electric world by making it comercially VIABLE
–Though the theories were gaining more CURRENCY, the evidence was still INCONCLUSIVE
–The boy took on a huagty tone, being SUPERCILIOUS to even his friends
–The girl was so spontaneous, her friends described her as CAPRICIOUS
–Neurosurgeon says choosing a job was less a DELIBERATE decision and more of an INSTINCTIVE one.</p>
<p>Walden comparison passages
–Author would say that isn’t how teachers use the text
–Behaviour was atypical for Thoreau
–Passage 1 Author would say train ruined nature’s tranquility</p>
<p>Africa and America
–Broad generalizations
–Cultural ties between two nations or ongoing relationship
–Unsubstantiated for the shadows question.
–Doubt to pride
–Grandma’s wisdom is CAUTIONARY</p>
<p>Ada King
–Purpose was to examine Ada King’s popularity, etc.
–Author would disagree that Ada’s parent had nothing to do with her fame.</p>
<p>Mona Lisa
–Author of Passage 1 would add “mouth”
–Leo’s quote was to characterize a technique
–“innate” to express doubt in a theory
–Passage 1 is to explain art technique, 2 examines its popularity
–The passage about the real Mona woman shows moderate social status –> great asthetic value
–Author of Passage 2 would say paragraph 1 of Passage 1 probably contributed to the POPULARITY
–Both authors would agree that Mona Lisa has 3-Dimensional qualities</p>
<p>City and Ecosystems
–Cliff talk = Appreciation for city ecosystem
–Tree/Building comparison = city must be self regulating to survive or Man is held back by natural laws (<– less likely, I think)
–Dams and anthills are like buildings = it is natural instinct
–3 pieces of evidence = arguments to support fundamental claim
–Peculiar = DISTINCT
–Blissful happiness in uncivilized era = FALSE SUPPOSITION
–“Thinkers” would say industrial revolution was DARK TURN (bad)
–“Vision” = conception(?)
–Naysayer arguments = erroneous
–Italics to emphasize
–Tree / City was a COMPARISON</p>
<p>Ms. Keeplar
–“Romantic” means unconventional outlook
–Hands to the heavens –> Bleak future
–Won’t marry guy because of his RECKLESS behaviour
–Response to celibacy question = refusal to answer
–Uncle and Girl have IRRECOLANCIABLE differences
–Uncle and Girl agree = She shouldn’t marry an undignified man
–Girl’s response to Uncle’s question interpreted as INQUIRY OF FUTURE PLANS
–The argument was IMPLAUSIBLE(? Thought it was a different word) because the Uncle has no control over the Girl
–The Girl DELIBERATELY MISINTERPRETS the Uncle’s question.</p>
<p>Admiring Nature & Comets
–Happy to be a human = ability to APPRECIATE THE BEAUTY OF NATURE
–Author uses METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE</p>
<p>Subtle difference between willingness to <strong>NEGOTIATE</strong> and eagerness to make <strong>CONCESSIONS</strong></p>
<p>does anyone know what answer choice this was? A, B, C, D, E</p>
<p>–The argument was IMPLAUSIBLE(? Thought it was a different word) because the Uncle has no control over the Girl</p>
<p>baseless</p>
<p>–No one could fault the politician’s ELOCUTION</p>
<p>wasn’t that in the experimental section?</p>
<p>wow lol…</p>
<p>Just so anyone isn’t confused:</p>
<p>The Girl DELIBERATELY MISINTERPRETS the Uncle’s question.
+</p>
<h1>Girl’s response to Uncle’s question interpreted as INQUIRY OF FUTURE PLANS</h1>
<p>same question</p>
<p>–No one could fault the politician’s ELOCUTION
= experimental</p>
<p>Girl’s response to Uncle’s question interpreted as INQUIRY OF FUTURE PLANS???</p>
<p>dionysus those were two different questions…</p>
<p>I don’t think they were the same question, where they? The MISINTERPRETATION was in response to the Uncle saying “Take Care”</p>
<p>The INQUIRY OF FUTURE PLANS was when the uncle asked something about “Where will you go” and she responds with something like “Not to the altar, that’s for certain!”</p>
<p>i put - inquiry of future plans</p>
<p>edit: my bad… “take care” was the uncle’s last quote right?</p>
<p>yes surprise, that’s right</p>
<p>No, they were different.</p>