<p>what were other choices for that question?</p>
<p>native tongue one?</p>
<p>oh yeah , what was the inquiry of plans one… what was the question to that</p>
<p>for the celibacy one…</p>
<p>was there an answer choice that was like… force her to answer the question ort something like that… it was something worded funnyh</p>
<p>hmmm…i put she was mocking him for one…but i guess that was wrong…can anyone confirm that for me lol</p>
<p>Yeah, it’s usually between those that and deliberate misinterpretation, but I think more people are going with the deliberate one.</p>
<p>what was the very first SC?</p>
<p>–No one could fault the politician’s ELOCUTION</p>
<p>was that one in the exp section? because i don’t remember it. anyone remember any of the other answer choices?</p>
<p>Can someone explain to me why the three reasons were fundamental claims and not leading up to a conclusion? The way I interpreted it, it seemed like he was stating his three reasons to lead up to the final conclusion that cities are ecosystems and part of nature…</p>
<p>hospitality</p>
<p>Apparently it was, so don’t worry about it.</p>
<p>why did he want her to marry so badly</p>
<p>does anyone else remember any more of the easier setence completions. i think we almost compiled them all. im guessing we are missing the easier ones.</p>
<p>nicole: to relieve himself of supposed family responsibilities</p>
<p>what about the native tongue one</p>
<p>i think it had something to do with her desire for love in a time when women were supposed to marry into money.</p>
<p>for the native tongue one i said something about him not being capable of understanding her</p>
<p>CONCENSUS ANSWERS SO FAR…</p>
<p>Sentence Completetion
–Because she welcomes people into her home, she was described as HOSPITABLE
–Subtle difference between willingness to <strong>NEGOTIATE</strong> and eagerness to make <strong>CONCESSIONS</strong>
–Dancer’s routine = DERIVATIVE & INEPT
–Material was so light as to be almost DIAPHANOUS
–Good policies are OSSIFIED by BEARUCRATIZATION
–The general was so disloyal, his name became synonymous with PERFIDY
–The photographer’s work was so simple, it was CANDID
–The teacher disliked institutions, so as to be ICONOCLAST
–The advancements in electric lamps TRANSFORMED the electric world by making it comercially VIABLE
–Though the theories were gaining more CURRENCY, the evidence was still INCONCLUSIVE
–The boy took on a huagty tone, being SUPERCILIOUS to even his friends
–The girl was so spontaneous, her friends described her as CAPRICIOUS
–Neurosurgeon says choosing a job was less a DELIBERATE decision and more of an INSTINCTIVE one.</p>
<p>Walden comparison passages
–Author would say that isn’t how teachers use the text
–Behaviour was atypical for Thoreau
–Passage 1 Author would say train ruined nature’s tranquility</p>
<p>Africa and America
–Broad generalizations
–Cultural ties between two nations or ongoing relationship
–Unsubstantiated for the shadows question.
–Doubt to pride
–Grandma’s wisdom is CAUTIONARY</p>
<p>Ada King
–Purpose was to examine Ada King’s popularity, etc.
–Author would disagree that Ada’s parent had nothing to do with her fame.</p>
<p>Mona Lisa
–Author of Passage 1 would add “mouth”
–Leo’s quote was to characterize a technique
–“innate” to express doubt in a theory
–Passage 1 is to explain art technique, 2 examines its popularity
–The passage about the real Mona woman shows moderate social status –> great asthetic value
–Author of Passage 2 would say paragraph 1 of Passage 1 probably contributed to the POPULARITY
–Both authors would agree that Mona Lisa has 3-Dimensional qualities</p>
<p>City and Ecosystems
–Cliff talk = Appreciation for city ecosystem
–Tree/Building comparison = city must be self regulating to survive or Man is held back by natural laws (<– less likely, I think)
–Dams and anthills are like buildings = it is natural instinct
–3 pieces of evidence = arguments to support fundamental claim
–Peculiar = DISTINCT
–Blissful happiness in uncivilized era = FALSE SUPPOSITION
–“Thinkers” would say industrial revolution was DARK TURN (bad)
–“Vision” = conception(?)
–Naysayer arguments = erroneous
–Italics to emphasize
–Tree / City was a COMPARISON</p>
<p>Ms. Keeplar
–“Romantic” means unconventional outlook
–Hands to the heavens –> Bleak future
–Won’t marry guy because of his RECKLESS behaviour
–Response to celibacy question = refusal to answer
–Uncle and Girl have IRRECOLANCIABLE differences
–Uncle and Girl agree = She shouldn’t marry an undignified man
–Girl’s response to Uncle’s question interpreted as INQUIRY OF FUTURE PLANS
–The argument was IMPLAUSIBLE(? Thought it was a different word) because the Uncle has no control over the Girl
–The Girl DELIBERATELY MISINTERPRETS the Uncle’s question.
–The Uncle wanted the Girl to marry to RELIEVE HIMSELF OF A PERCEIVED FAMILIAL RESPONSIBILITY
–Girl thinks LOVE A PREREQUISITE FOR MARRIAGE
–Foreign tongue = UNCLE NOT CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING</p>
<p>Admiring Nature & Comets
–Happy to be a human = ability to APPRECIATE THE BEAUTY OF NATURE
–Author uses METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE</p>
<p>want there an answer choice that said something like “she didnt understand him” or something</p>
<p>all i remember was that she didn’t expect her uncle to understand her romantic, love-mongering language.</p>