**OFFICIAL October SAT Writing Thread**

<p>yeah Jyankees… second your reasoning…</p>

<p>cool you guys put B. :)</p>

<p>For the baby one I put “to distinguish” because I thought it was “of distinguishing”… not sure tho…</p>

<p>Keep adding questions/answers to the list!</p>

<p>1) Neurological baby
2) Warehouses, across from and verb doesn’t agree
3) Easter island sculputres (NO ERROR)
4) Musical instruments 300 years old (NO ERROR)
5) Heat lightning (NO ERROR)
6) Hank Aron ambiguity
7) Something about age 65 AND/OR older?
8) Castles enter at your own peril
9) Lacking the comforts of a palace, Castles instead blah blah blah
10) Provide more information in first paragraph about palaces
11) Last sentence: austere in background of comfort
12) Castles fade into obscurity
13) Connecting word is ironically</p>

<p>Something about age 65 AND/OR older: I put no error. It sounds better with AND, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be that. And another question for the list: what was the lightning one? Heat lightning is different from lightning, because it occurs at too great a distance to hear. I think I put no error.</p>

<p>I put no error I believe.</p>

<p>"Something about age 65 AND/OR older: I put no error. It sounds better with AND, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be that. "</p>

<p>i used the same logic</p>

<p>yeah i circled the or , but it was a very weird answer, and since i had used up my 3 no errors, i didnt want to put another</p>

<p>What about the one about cosmetic dentistry in section 10?</p>

<p>that was the “-ing” parallelism. Cosmetic dentistry is…“occurring because people are taking care of their cavities and getting more vain.”</p>

<p>hooray!!!</p>

<p>I think I put “occurs because of…”. There was no is… was there?</p>

<p>-The Occuring Coot66</p>

<p>There was another question…Games are a phenomenon. That was odd.</p>

<p>for the baby one, it was like … Capable to distinguish
which should have been…
capable of distinguishing…</p>

<p>was that the same one as neurological?</p>

<p>I don’t remember a baby question… maybe it was on the experimental section only?</p>

<p>-The Babyish Coot66</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>That was what I got…</p>

<p>i think it was the neurological one…
anyways, for the warehouses question, is there a consensus?..</p>

<p>there was a verb agreement error for the warehouses one</p>

<p>what was the error? I put no error for the warehouses</p>