<p>what is the verb agreement error?.. it was something like…
the old derelict house across from the warehouses and the even more decrepit house beside them have been chosen as landmarks…</p>
<p>dammit does anyone remember the one about naploen? i put ‘justified in taking’</p>
<p>have been was not a verb agreement error…and that was the only very underlined…so no, that’s wrong, there was no error there</p>
<p>anyways, i had 5 no errors:
- 65 years or older
- warehouses
- Easter island sculputres
- Musical instruments 300 years old
- Heat lightning </p>
<p>if anyone found errors on those, please do tell…</p>
<p>I don’t remember what I put for easter island…but same on the other 4</p>
<p>Can someone explain to me the one about the castle, and the answer is “actually”</p>
<p>For the question When Sheila and someone entered the store, she noticed that the menu had changed…the error was replacing she with a name?</p>
<p>I filled up my whole essay, and I even had to double up on the lines because I ran out of room when writing my conclusion. ;)</p>
<p>By the way, when do we receive our scores?</p>
<p>no doodie the answer is ironically. </p>
<p>the passage talks about how the castles are built to keep out invaders in times of war, but IRONICALLY now it is inviting for guests.</p>
<ol>
<li>I changed it to and</li>
<li>I think for sure the error was that it should be BESIDES instead of beside.
The other 3 i agree with you.</li>
</ol>
<p>What was wrong with the paragraph in the castle passage? I said that they should have defined palaces more, since it was a one-sided comparison between castles and palaces</p>
<p>yes, they should have fully defined palaces.</p>
<p><a href=“Homework Help and Textbook Solutions | bartleby”>Homework Help and Textbook Solutions | bartleby;
<p>“beside the warehouses” should be correct… I think (I suck at this stuff)…</p>
<p>"anyways, i had 5 no errors:
- 65 years or older
- warehouses
- Easter island sculputres
- Musical instruments 300 years old
- Heat lightning </p>
<p>if anyone found errors on those, please do tell…"</p>
<p>im not sure but i think i found errors on #2</p>
<p>well i’ll be satisfied with 4 out of 5…guys, on another topic… I think the sentence corrections were pretty good this time right?</p>
<p>For the question with the short passage with the clouds and comets and ended in “It’s good to be human”, what rhetorical device was the author primarly using?</p>
<p>-appeal to emotion
-metaphorical language
-extended analogy</p>
<p>For the lightning one where it said: “such and such” lightning is not lightning caused by heat, but casued by “such and such.” </p>
<p>I put there was an error under the portion “lightning caused by heat” because saying that it’s not lightning is weird, you would just say that “such and such” lightning is not caused by heat… blah." You would/should omit the word lightning. anyone agree?</p>
<p>Edit: ^^ metaphorical language to the person above</p>
<p>Guys what did you put for the one about braveheart. I put D i think the one that was not, as many people assume, in scotland.</p>
<p>that was E gyros</p>
<p>i got what gyros did</p>