<p>The one that was I II and III works like this</p>
<p>B-C-A-D with the distance b/w B and A being 5, C and A being 3 and C and D being 7.</p>
<p>The one that was I II and III works like this</p>
<p>B-C-A-D with the distance b/w B and A being 5, C and A being 3 and C and D being 7.</p>
<p>there’s not an exaggeration consensus lol</p>
<p>I put polarized…fruitful.</p>
<p>Firstly, polarized is a much better word to use in context. How do you prove that the debates were impassioned? But it was clearly polarized because it had two truly opposite parties. </p>
<p>Secondly, although the debate was kinda inconclusive, precisely because there were two opposite views, the author explicitly stated that there were a lot of benefits to these debates. I remember him stating that we can use these debates to appreciate music blah blah blah.</p>
<p>I honestly hate CR. So many answers that are very similar. I just hope I got this one right.</p>
<p>@luluz yeah, I think it was the last one</p>
<p>@glasscube
Yay I changed my answer at the last minute to mundane</p>
<p>@Rkamil9-
hmm i don’t see it
perhaps i don’t have that bookyou’re talking about …</p>
<p>What was the ABCD question number… someone please answer? Was it question 1 in a math section</p>
<p>why did marguerite mention her brother? i put that she enjoyed the novelty of the situation</p>
<p>@collegetalk11 the argument just seemed very heated. if you looked in the footnotes about luddites, for example, they were very impassioned about what they did. calling themselves the ‘party of doom’ furthered this. and the author specifically stated in the end that there were ‘no unshakable conclusions’, thus largely inconclusive. fruitful was too extreme because nothing so extraordinary was really accomplished</p>
<p>Especially this one… I’m beginning to doubt myself on my answers now. Sigh</p>
<p>How was it mundane though? And it could be satire right?</p>
<p>DOUBLE PASSAGE:</p>
<p>i said that passage 1 is confused with #s in passage 2
what…
am i wrong …</p>
<p>and,
is it “derisive” for one of the answers.
that’s what i put …</p>
<p>can someone rememeber the reading passages besides the music one and the cookie girl one (meaning at least 5 questions)</p>
<p>it’s impassioned…inconclusive.
the author makes it clear that he is neutral as he stands a middle ground.
also he specifically states that the particular subject is “inconclusive”</p>
<p>Was the question about x-intercept of a line parallel to a given line in the experimental section?</p>
<p>@diddly123-
i heard that’s the answer
sadly, i put that flowers aspired her
sigh .</p>
<p>I had a bee one, confused man lost memory,</p>
<p>I II and III were all valid for the ABCD problem. Read through the old threads and re-work it out if you don’t believe me or @Tidumattud. Both of us have scored 800s on M and USAMO is big ****. I’ve scored 9/10 at ARML for the past two years now. This year nothing less than a perfect score is acceptable. Just figured I’d delineate my credentials as well.</p>
<p>In regards to the satire-exaggeration discussion, the little girl displays reverence for the older woman with whom she was visiting. Satires mock and poke fun at with the goal of inciting change. What change did the little girl hope to see in her “idol”/friend? None. She was in awe of the older lady and her respect is evident throughout the entirety of the anecdote. Marking exaggeration was a better choice.</p>
<p>In regards to the peach, or was it grape, variety and use of neither question from section 10, the answer was neither of which (“which” referenced the peach varieties).</p>
<p>collegetalk, the debates were definitely impassioned (the dude spent the entirety of the 1st paragraph talking about some senator/representative who was butthurt about electronic music). </p>
<p>Secondly, the author never stated that the debates were fruitful or led to appreciation of music. In fact, he stated that he wanted a pragmatic middle ground free of both pessimism and zeal (in regards to a new wave of electronic music) that has yet to be found.</p>
<p>And the purpose of the last paragraph in the music section was that the writer was taking a middle ground or something like that right?</p>
<p>@cookiestuf those only had 2 questions each. I think the bee one had 5</p>