<p>@ragingrag In what way was it fruitful?</p>
<p>OHH for some reason i thought that disparate meant like desperate. i’m so dumb ugh. for some reason i put fulsome even though i knew it was wrong</p>
<p>i got impassioned…inconclusive. the argument was very heated adn the author said no definitive conclusions have been reached</p>
<p>not trepidation…defiance. he specifically stated that he wasn’t scared and he wasn’t defying anything at the end, he just didn’t take action</p>
<p>@Rkamil9-
WOAAH
which princeton review
the one with 11 practice tests or what
and what prractice test #/ page?!</p>
<p>@tidumattud i am aiming for an 800… i didn’t say you dont know what you’re talking about i just think maybe you dont remember the numbers correctly… if nobody agreed with me i wouldnt still be talking about it but apparently alot of people do</p>
<p>But if the conversation went on radical tangents wouldn’t that mean it wasn’t fruitful?</p>
<p>Also, everyone keeps saying it was I, II, and III. Can someone please show why III is correct instead of just stating that it is without justification?</p>
<p>@diddly123 oh yeah never screw yourself over like that by picking the answer that you know is wrong. I guessed on that one and luckily got it right!</p>
<p>i chose the polarized one because i didnt think the people having the debate were overzealous (which is what "impassioned means by the way) and the debate did offer some benefit to form a greater understanding of the effects of music-recording in society. im sooo confused by this question</p>
<p>@relatively smart, i dont remember the exact reasoning why III was correct but somehow it was able to fit. one of the segments was 5, the other was 3, and 7 could fit in between</p>
<p>@tidumattud in the last paragraph the author specifically stated that scientists generally haven’t made any “unshakable conclusions”</p>
<p>@cookiestuf think about it, the conversation about edison’s invention gained opposing viewpoints that suddenly it allowed radical ideas to form, just like that of the musician who complained to Congress in 1906 by the name of Chief Keef Sossa</p>
<p>Can I please have a link to the Google Document?</p>
<p>Two questions about CR: Was the one that asked about her opinion of Tale of Two Cities satisfactory to scholarly?
Was the one that asked about her attitude in the quote about death being a kind punishment exaggeration or satire; I put satire but I’m not sure…</p>
<p>was revelation an answer for the cookie/read books passage</p>
<p>@hellogloria go in to the princeton review manual book. the whole passage about that girl and Ms. Flowers is on page 416 sorry</p>
<p>admirable figure or close friend?</p>
<p>@tidumattud that is true but the man in the beginning seemed pretty zealous towards his cause and then there were also the radicals that I guess destroyed the new electronic music</p>
<p>III (each of the dashes represents one unit of length)
B—C–A-----D</p>
<p>@cookiestuf I think the passage said it helped him find a middle ground and weigh the positives and negatives together. I’m not completely sure though</p>
<p>@CLCCCES</p>
<p>No. Mundane to extraordinary consensus.</p>
<p>Exaggeration consensus.</p>
<p>wait for the double passage</p>
<p>i said that passage 1 is confused with #s in passage 2
what…
am i wrong …</p>
<p>@diddly admirable figure I think. She said she was ‘perfect’ which I consider more of an admiration than anything.</p>