<p>@jlee4001</p>
<p>what did you put? do you remember the other choices?</p>
<p>@jlee4001</p>
<p>what did you put? do you remember the other choices?</p>
<p>@daveeed I think that answer works. I put 0.009. so maybe 0.001-0.009 as answers</p>
<p>@Piquant I can’t say I remember. If I saw it I’d know it. Look around, I will too, and let’s see if we can talk about the answer</p>
<p>Piquant I think the second word of my answer was ‘indiscretions’.</p>
<p>What’s the largest post-SAT test discussion thread on here? Let’s set, or break, the record.</p>
<p>Indiscretions was for another vocab (Jim and his coworkers)</p>
<p>I picked cataclysmic just because they seemed to be the only two words that concretely fit even if it was a bit extreme</p>
<p>@xCossack</p>
<p>Thanks! I remember now, I changed it to the indiscretions answer during the test.</p>
<p>@jlee
I’m in!</p>
<p>But back to my question from the previous page, who thinks CB, to an extent, monitors the web and forums like this to combat and “bust” test takers like us? Lol</p>
<p>@Kpopzz</p>
<p>I think the right answer was like more recorded music</p>
<p>@cookestuf
you sure it’s there is spectulation?</p>
<p>Silly I think that there is speculation was right. I think so</p>
<p>@jlee4001
I’m suspicious too. Do you know anyone that has been ‘busted’ for this?</p>
<p><strong><em>Record=2,491</em></strong></p>
<p>We’re almost there. 100 posts to go!</p>
<p>@silly I chose there is vs the other options because of the tense. Present tense!</p>
<p>honestly **** reading at this point it’s way too subjective</p>
<p>i picked cataclysmic as well… for those that picked otherwise, which did you choose???</p>
<p>@clover</p>
<p>Do you remember the question?</p>
<p>nvm it was experimental!</p>
<p>Anyone remember the pie chart with %'s question for math? It was placed at the end of a page.</p>
<p>@daveeed
Just add up the percentages and multiply them by the total #</p>
<p>I would be more specific but I don’t remember the exact numbers</p>
<p>@cookie
That’s what I did. But yeah, haha, I was looking for someone to jog up my memory with the #s</p>