<p>40 (angle x), 1/2 (z), 2830 (arithmetic), 90 (how many needed for 51%), 12 (perimeter), 831 (greatest possible value), .001 (k), 1680 (cotton), 64/9 (circle), 4 (p+q values) </p>
<p>All GRID INS ^^</p>
<p>12 (perimeter of triangle)
SQRT 6 (Radius of cone/cylinder)
r+4,s+4 (#20 Graph/Parabla)
15 Birds (Birds, Cats, Dogs)
7/12 (Salad/Sandwhiches)
10x (angle of 36 degrees had an arc of x)
20pi (circumfrence)</p>
<p>Any controversial MC</p>
<p>For the graph/parabola it’s r+1, s+4
Also for k you have a wide range (0.005 works)</p>
<p>How does one get his hands on this document? If someone could PM it to me that’d be great. Otherwise?</p>
<p>40 (angle x), 1/2 (z), 2830 (arithmetic), 90 (how many needed for 51%), 12 (perimeter), 831 (greatest possible value), .001-.009 (k), 1680 (cotton), 64/9 (circle), 4 (p+q values) </p>
<p>All GRID INS ^^</p>
<p>12 (perimeter of triangle)
SQRT 6 (Radius of cone/cylinder)
r+1,s+4 (#20 Graph/Parabla)
15 Birds (Birds, Cats, Dogs)
7/12 (Salad/Sandwhiches)
10x (angle of 36 degrees had an arc of x)
20pi (circumfrence)</p>
<p>Any controversial MC</p>
<p>ADMIT IT: IT’S SOMEWHAT DERISIVE. Kidding, kidding. It’s fine guys. -1 on CR is still 800. If it’s really that ambiguous, they will take it out. Shouting out credentials should not be what this thread has to devolve to.</p>
<p>What is this document everyone is talking about</p>
<p>@Raytemnewo you forgot the parallelogram one. what was that?</p>
<p>Guys. We signed something saying we wouldn’t speak about it. People have no dignity these days.</p>
<p>Parallelogram was 1/3, didnt seem too hard</p>
<p>Yea honestly could someone PM me this doc that everyone is talkin about</p>
<p>PLEASE ANSWER
On the question in which everyone is saying the answer is 64/9, is it okay to put 7.11???
PLEASE ANSWER</p>
<p>So the two most controversial CR questions:</p>
<p>1) Mundane and extraordinary vs. Romantic and Dramatic
2) Neutral vs. Slightly Derisive</p>
<p>Also: Anyone remember the question about what would the author of passage 1 think about the viewpoints of passage 2?
Choices were valid (because evidence from Apiary study), misleading, too much personal opinion, or not true (because evidence says otherwise)</p>
<p>yes I PUT down 7.11</p>
<p>I said it wasn’t true because evidence said otherwise</p>
<p>Right now I’m at -0 M(crossing fingers I didn’t misbubble or something)
CR i’m probably at -1/2 but i dont care bc i already have an 800
W I may be at -1 or -2, but I filled up all the space with three solid examples, so I’m hoping for a 10-12
based on this, is 2300+ possible(using 800CR)?</p>
<p>Should have put 64/9. 7.11 is not 64/9. 64/9 is 7.1111111111111111111111</p>
<p>For the record, its better not to put down decimals as it simply leaves more room for error. In this case, 64/9 is 7.11111111111 repeating so it was fine</p>
<p>I think one of the cr questions is not gonna be scored</p>
<p>There was a math r</p>
<p>@satsarecool Yes you are sitting at about 2350 or 2370</p>