<p>No, I didn’t!</p>
<p>For the Writing paragraph correction…</p>
<p>did you guys get “some of them” or “there is speculation”</p>
<p>Sillyup20, I answered “there is speculation”.</p>
<p>I put “some of them” because in context there is speculation doesn’t work (the next sentence uses “they” so you can’t put there is speculation)</p>
<p>10 more days until PSAT ****</p>
<p>I put the one that said something like “scientists say” so that there wasn’t an ambiguous pronoun reference…</p>
<p>For those wondering about the doc answers</p>
<p>Critical Reading (Sentence Completion): </p>
<ol>
<li><p>Flowery Dress: Gaudy</p></li>
<li><p>punctilious the girl didnt let anyone deviate from the rules what were the answer choices again? im pretty sure the answer to this one was unshakeable. <em>any other answer choices? ugh, i still cant remember the question. at all.</em> maybe it was experimental
<em>i dont remember this question. maybe it was experimental?</em> <em>I believe this one is unshakeable, these were the best two options unshakeable or punctilious.</em> <–yes This was definitely punctilious. The sentence said even the slightest deviation. So therefore it had to be punctilious. Punctilious means attention and detail orientated and had a slightly negative connotation that matched that of the sentence. </p></li>
</ol>
<p>unshakableadjectiveshe finally came to trust Hal’s unshakable love: steadfast, resolute, staunch, firm, decided, determined,unswerving, unwavering; unyielding, inflexible, dogged, obstinate, obdurate, tenacious, persistent,indefatigable, tireless, unflagging, unremitting, unrelenting, relentless.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Evoked…epitomized Perpetuated and something?</p></li>
<li><p>conciliated…placated</p></li>
<li><p>quotidian forgot last choice. (isnt this commodious?) quotidian means occurring daily, the question wanted to show the buildings were similar. commodious means big…it (esp. of furniture or a building) roomy and comfortable. I picked blighted//almost 100% sure its commodious <em>ITS DEFINITELY NOT COMMODIOUS. I PICKED COMMODIOUS. BUT I WAS WRONG…</em></p></li>
<li><p>exonerate/implicate (clarify on what the question was?) - some woman was supporting some guys testimony but unwittingly ended up trapping herself. - idk if it was experimental or not. <em>i dont think this was experimental. got the same answer</em> Definietely not experiemntal. I had math experimental and I had it. </p></li>
<li><p>faculty/engaging</p></li>
<li><p>inhospitable (are you sure this was right. the weather suddenly dropped in temperature. i got distant. for sure it wasnt balmy)</p></li>
<li><p>Disparate calm down lol there were a wide range of characters all unlike each other. therefore its disparate <em>DOES ANYONE REMEMBER ALL THE ANSWER CHOICES</em> almost 100% sure its disparate <em>i just want to know the answer choices because i forgot which answer i picked… like that question just left a blank hole in my brain</em></p></li>
<li><p>indiscretions (question was about an affable co worker) Does anyone remember what it talked about specifically? It talked about how even though mike was very charismatic (I think) what was the factor that it led to indiscretions? </p></li>
<li><p>preserves/reconstruct. the arid climate of the desert preserved the Native peoples leather items so scientists were able to reconstruct some idea of their culture</p></li>
</ol>
<p>12.Conversation (it was one of the #1s) Yes. It was about how the interviews were more open and conversation like than interview-like.</p>
<p>10 was Although Mike was ver charming, his co-workers could not overlook his ____</p>
<p>with a night’s rest, I agree that mundane…extraordinary is a superior answer.</p>
<p>bigger picture, romantic…dramatic doesn’t reflect the shift in character’s opinion. overthought this one.</p>
<p>discretion @superstarlala</p>
<p>It was jim, not mike, dammit!</p>
<p>derisive over neutral.</p>
<p>the key are the modifying adverbs. he was a tiny bit derisive, calling them the “party of doom”.</p>
<p>scholarly neutral would imply total neutrality like an academic paper. He inject too much of his opinion to be scholarly neutral.</p>
<p>Math (Multiple Choice - 44 questions):
- Lines l and K are parallel to each other. L passes (-1,-6) and also passes vertex of Parabola y=-2(x-1)^2+2(???), What is a point on line K? The coordinate is : (r+1, s +4) -> this was choice A
2.Line with ABCD(not in that order): Answer: All 3(I,II,III) this was choice E <em>I believe the numbers were 5, 7, and 3, but I can’t remember which letters they correspond to</em></p>
<p>The distance between A and B is 5, B and C 3, C and D 7. </p>
<p>i) C is between A and B (LINE ACBD)</p>
<p>ii) D is between A and B (LINE ADBC)</p>
<p>iii)A is between C and D(LINE DACB)</p>
<ol>
<li><p>What is the graph for 1.5x +20? = B. Graph with y int above origin and is Linear, this was choice B </p></li>
<li><p>How many children were two or less years old? 90? << Thats whatt I got estoy de acuredo</p></li>
<li><p>What number along with -7 and 7 would make the product, sum and average equal? 0</p></li>
<li><p>What is the value of the Radius(Cone and Cylinder with same value h)? R=SqRoot(6)</p></li>
<li><p>Which of these points lie in the shaded region?(-1,0)( I believe its choice B ?)</p></li>
<li><p>Parallelogram with BC dividing base into three equal segments: (⅓)</p></li>
<li><p>Scatter plot: 7/12 </p></li>
</ol>
<p>10.Someone does 3 Minutes of exercising and burns 14 calories. Then does m minutes and burns total of 210, What is the function representing this? (14/3)(m+3)=210. (Because find m to be 42 and it checks out 
)</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Whats the smallest integer for (a/b) if -5<a<5 and 1<b<5? Ans: -2</p></li>
<li><p>Circumference of circle: When the inner angle of a piece of a circle is 36 and the curve length of that piece is ??, what is the circumference of the circle? </p></li>
</ol>
<p>I DONT REMEMBER THE ‘??’ VALUE HELP ME GUYS</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Cirumference Question in terms of x : 10x</p></li>
<li><p>What is the points scored by Carmen? : 24</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Three soccer players. One scores 12, other scores 15. the last guy’s score is unknown… the 15 guy scored two points less than the average, making the average 17. therefore the sum of everyone’s scores is 17*3, which is 51. 51- (12+15)= 51-27=24. The answer is 24.</p>
<p>Answer was 24. </p>
<ol>
<li>Three consecutive integers: a<b<c</li>
</ol>
<p>Three consecutive even numbers x<y<z</p>
<p>wait………… i dont remember the next part of the question…………… shoooot.</p>
<p>but i think the answer was a=x+1</p>
<p>^wait is this experimental? idk………</p>
<p>check the bottom of this gDoc to see if its an experimental it doesnt say its experimental?</p>
<p>sorry. keep going OKEYDOKES.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>m=2r: If the median (m) and range (r) of 15 numbers are the same, then what describes the relationship between the median and range if all numbers were multiplied by 4? (other choices: m=r, m=4r):</p></li>
<li><p>amusement park question w/ the pie chart: 480</p></li>
<li><p>put the number in order of x,y,z… pretty sure it was x<z<y, ya it was, it was x=0.012, y=1.20, and z=0.120, or something liek that</p></li>
</ol>
<p>was the math section with 831 as a grid answer experimental?</p>
<p>Can people come to a consensus on the writing Improving Paragraphs “there was speculation” “Many scientists” or “some of them” not sure of exact wording</p>
<p>Sorry Cocaine 16 looks wrong…it’s m=r</p>
<p>Why can’t these 18 days hurry up? :(</p>
<p>Math
Easy: 3 (+1) I thought it was way easier than the past ones I’ve taken, but I still read two wrong… I did perimeter of figure bounded by x and y axis, and I did area of the outer ring of circle instead of ratio… Damn, whatever, 760 from March is good enough.
Average: 5
Hard:</p>
<p>CR
Easy: 2
Average:
Hard: 7 (+1) Sentence comps were pretty hard, and lots of questions with two pretty good answers (hopefully I can still pull a 750+ for a 2300 + superscore)</p>
<p>Writing
Easy: 2
Average: 6 (+1) I think I got arond 750, but I already have 800, so it doesn’t matter
Hard: 0</p>
<p>As for CR questions, I put scholarly neutral, he may have described them as luddites and the party of doom (party of doom was not meant derisvively in context!! It was about how they thought technology would doom music!), but that does not mean derisive. Derisive is almost scorning or laughing at them, and the whole passage is about how he describes the two sides of the argument (neutrally) and then puts in his own compromise.</p>
<p>I put mundane/ extraordinary</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the ms. flowers question about the cookies, I put propriety to spontaneity. Is that right?</p>
<p>So far I only have the stipulation one wrong and one sentence comp. wrong… hopefully it stays that way</p>
<p>@samuelkim These aren’t my answers they’re the collective answers, but you’re right. I think it was changed in the document later anyway.</p>
<p>@dumbandlethal
i put “some scientists”
@satman1111
yes its propriety to spontaneity</p>