<p>glasscube pls tell me you’re sarcastic, bc im not sarcastic about cancelling if i get it wrong</p>
<p>What was the sentence completion about New York was autonomous and then let like another state take over and the one about how it will be both harmful to the animal and scientist?</p>
<p>Houston that’s what I put and a lot of ppl put that as well</p>
<p>“no way it isn’t” = the answer is (as far as everyone knows) float, which is what you and I both put</p>
<p>aqueous -> float
fo sho</p>
<p>glasscube</p>
<p>oo… ty… as you can see my critical reading skills are lacking.</p>
<p>please explain (bee passage): The author of passage 1 would most likely argue in response to the author of passage 2 that → his evidence was unsupported. what were the other choices???</p>
<p>Nike, the answer was float.</p>
<p>atput73</p>
<p>isn’t it ambiguous?</p>
<p>Consensus on “mild disapproval”?</p>
<p>Did anyone remember what they put for #13 on sec 10? Was it the really short one?</p>
<p>yes i put mild disapproval and float for aqueous.</p>
<p>I did not put mild disapproval. I don’t remember the other choices, but I think the author was saying how the people were acting peculiar not that she disagreed with their actions.</p>
<p>yeah, I thought of chemistry, and I think it’s floating.</p>
<p>what did u guys put for the bee passage question that asked how the author for passage 1 would respond to passage 2</p>
<p>I said evidence unsupported</p>
<p>So if the curve for CR is a bit more generous, what would missing 4 or 5 get me?</p>
<p>Did this “evidence unsupported” answer you guys are saying include something about the decrease in the bee population?</p>
<p>I think it actually said something along the lines of “the evidence supported that the bee population was declining”</p>
<p>yea i think so houstonrep</p>
<p>Can someone be kind enough to pm me the google doc please?? I will contribute to the document!!</p>