<p>@stg but it was “neither,” which will take on a singular verb…</p>
<p>It’s undermine a claim because there were two “howevers” and the second one wasn’t explaining a misconception (only the first one was). There was a general consensus on this a while back.</p>
<p>I got answers from my tutor who has been getting 2400 on evry sats so far.</p>
<ol>
<li>Mundane to ordinart</li>
<li>Automaton</li>
</ol>
<p>First one: The author clearly states that originally A Tale of Two Cities merely “met her standards as a romantic novel,” so it was nothing extraordinary to her. It just met her standards. But then when Mrs. Flower reads it, it sounds like “poetry” or “music” to her, so it became extraordinary. That’s a better match for “romantic to dramatic.”</p>
<p>Second: Both “zombified” and “will just copy” indicate that the listener is brainless. That’s what an “automaton” is: a robot that just mechanically goes through the motions without deep thought. A “dilettante” is an amateur who tries to act like an expert, which is unmentioned.</p>
<p>His explanation.</p>
<p>Yo tkim…you should ask your tutor for Writing question #13 Section 10</p>
<p>Just to clarify, I said ordinary when I asked him. That’s why he says romantic and dramatic but when I asked him again he said the extraordinary</p>
<p>I’d u can provide me exact contexts and questions I can adk him for u guys</p>
<p>hey tkim, but i remember the author mentioned at one point that he first thought the book was a romantic novel
also can you ask him about the reading question please? (if the author was explaining a misconception or undermining a claim for the howevers) thanks</p>
<p>I need exact context (or very similar one" as well as exact question.</p>
<p>As for your argument, did not ask him but what I’m guessing is the girl os clarifying the genre not how she sees the novel. I woll ask him tho</p>
<p>Yeah I read it as the genre is romantic not is is romantic. Couldn’t something romantic also be dramatic? That doesn’t show a change. Something mundane is not also extraordinary.</p>
<p>Guys, I forget which answer I put, but I am pretty sure the answer was mundane to extraordinary. The passage indeed said it was a romatic novel, but the key shift in her attitude of the novel did not have to do with its contents, but with its liveliness. Thus, mundane to extraordinary is a much better answer.</p>
<p>Line ABCD (not in that order)The distance between A and B is 5, B and C is 3, C and D is 7. Which of the following are possible? D.(II,III)
i) C is between A and B (LINE ACBD)
ii) D is between A and B (LINE ADBC)
iii)A is between C and D(LINE DACB)
Isn’t this all?</p>
<p>[International version] Guys I had math as experimental…for those who had reading as experimental, did you get a question where there was a rectangle within which a rectangular carpet was placed in the center and the question asked for the rectangular carpet’s possible dimensions</p>
<p>another question - it said that a line was perpendicular to the x or y axis (don’t remember) and that line passed through the point (2,4) or (4,2), again not sure…you had to find the equation for that line.</p>
<p>Just wanted to clarify if these questions were in the experimental…because I might have got them wrong…</p>
<p>Why doesn’t i) work?</p>
<p>tkim could you also ask him about the “scholarly neutral” vs the “slightly derisive” question? It was the part where the author talked about the “party of doom” with Luddites, lawyers, etc. if you remember the context…</p>
<p>The first two are right, trust me i tested it out extensivly</p>
<p>I hope you guys did well on yesterday’s test.
I just have two questions.
whatd you get for problem 13 of section 10? the comparison problem?
Also, last reading section vocab problem…the arid environment one.</p>
<p>The arid environment one was preserves… Reconstructions. I don’t what problem 13 section ten was.</p>
<p>Can we stretch this to 200 pages in length? Here’s to the prospect.</p>
<p>Problem 13 sect 10 wasn’t it the short answer one</p>