<p>The first guy had an opinion too…</p>
<p>For the bee passage^</p>
<p>I really don’t know where in this thread there has been a discussion about the Bee question with respect to what would Passage 1 say about Passage 2. The google doc says that it is confirmed that Passage 1 would say that Passage 2 is problematic, b/c there was too much of his opinion. I don’t understand this at all. Passage 1 definitely had an opinion, after all, he wasn’t just shooting some statistics, he was fervently arguing that the Bees are essential for society. Secondly, I chose the choice that said; questionable, because there was a major decline in Bee population. I chose this because the author of passage 2 qualifies the extremity of the situation by noting that percentages are only around 30% of decline. The first sentence of passage 1 went some thing along the lines of “There has been a catastrophic decline in the populations of bees…bla bla bla…”</p>
<p>Can anyone please tell me why I’m wrong?</p>
<p>FlaWless that was my line of reasoning and I think it’s correct.
Also is there a consensus on whether it’s impassioned…inconclusive or polarized…surprisingly fruitful?</p>
<p>I put that as well, and when I put it I had no doubt. It was an easy question to me.</p>
<p>However, a lot of people say that the answer was the choice that said something like “the evidence is unsupported.” The google docs answer has to be wrong.</p>
<p>What were the other choices for the mrs. flowers question about why she wanted to show her brother the house? the answer was supposed to be novelty of the situation</p>
<p>Sorry if this question has been asked a lot, but where can I find a link to that Google Doc?</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the bee passage when it listed some problems faced by bees?
The gdoc says “typically encountered by beekeepers”, but I think its “threats” to the bee population.</p>
<p>No it’s “typically encountered by beekeepers”…that’s the only one that made sense in context</p>
<p>no the answer should be threats to bees, the listing of bees dying in various ways in context does not relate to beekeepers’ problems</p>
<p>What did the threats choice exactly say?</p>
<p>If I remember correctly that quotation was from Passage 2, when the author was arguing that the listing of bees dying in several ways is a typical problem commonly faced by beekeepers (thereby lessening the importance given to it by the author of Passage 1)…</p>
<p>where can i get this google doc too? :(</p>
<p>What was the answer for the agricultural/chemical double passage question that asked about what passage 1 did and what passage 2 did?</p>
<p>Was the answer “the author of passage 2 presents a modified solution from what is introduced in passage 1”?</p>
<p>Does anyone know what answer choice (1/3) was for the parallelogram question. I remember putting either B,C,or D, but definitely not A or B.</p>
<p>someone send me the link to the doc s’il vous pla</p>
<p>I remember one of the things listed was “pesticides” and everything else listed was killing off the bees. I dont see how that relates to the beekeepers.</p>
<p>The answers were the threats that the beekepers had to combat wasn’t it? It was the only one that made any sense.</p>
<p>zephyr, I think you missed the point of Passage 2, which was to emphasize that Passage 1 was being overly dramatic and that even though there is a threat to bees, it’s no more than what beekeepers usually encounter.</p>
<p>@Harrovian Yeah. I dont remember the exact answer, but it had threat in it.</p>