<p>What apes? Are you guys talking about the other test?</p>
<p>and was the (2,4,9) thing answer choice A?</p>
<p>What apes? Are you guys talking about the other test?</p>
<p>and was the (2,4,9) thing answer choice A?</p>
<p>For the Apes question, how did you guys choose to end the passage?</p>
<p>I think when you have 2 of the same back to back, one is the experimental.
I found it to be relatively easy, a few tricky ones. But then again, the more writing practice I’ve been doing, the worse I’m getting :/</p>
<p>I had the apes but nothin about a boy & dad…
I got 15b for bottles. I had ellipse and cows. I’m not sure what my experimental one was…</p>
<p>@classiclays
The apes and painting and abstract art for the fix passage part of writing. and yes.</p>
<p>@SirDan What were the answer choices?</p>
<p>I don’t remember how I ended it, exactly… what were the choices? I think I chose something about people still choosing to pay a lot of money for the art?</p>
<p>I believe that’s what i picked</p>
<p>I remember the ape thing now. Does anyone know any specific questions about it?</p>
<p>@migglie I believe I chose something like that too.</p>
<p>same i picked that too. Do u guys which section the apes writing section came? I got it in section 2. Or do they mix around those as well.</p>
<p>@migglie
Was 15b choice A?</p>
<p>Let’s start some heated debates :)</p>
<p>For the “dermis” skin question:
Pun vs Defining a term (I personally chose defining a term)</p>
<p>Pluralism vs. Fanaticism vs. Atavism (I personally chose pluralism but I think its fanaticism)</p>
<p>Pluralism argument: “A form of society in which minority groups maintain their independent cultural traditions.”</p>
<p>Fanaticism argument: Nobody went elsewhere because they were fanatics about staying at the same place.</p>
<p>Atavism: Don’t think this is at all right but people like this for some reason.</p>
<p>For everyone talking about the a=2 b=3 if b=6 then a=?
Notice that the question draws absolutley no relationship between a and b, meaning it doesn’t have to a function or it can be any function. Thus consider this function. x=2. For any value y x=2. So if x=2 then y=3. If y=6 x would still equal 2. So it is possible that x can equal two even if y = 6. </p>
<p>Also on another note. Can someone please clarify which section the apes writing section passage came. Was it section 2 for you guys, or do they jumble that around too?</p>
<p>but… fanatical means “motivated or characterized by an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm or zeal, as in religion or politics.”
what was the wording of the question again?</p>
<p>i chose pun… no idea why i chose that lol</p>
<p>@hulster…</p>
<p>but the question says “if a = 2, then b = 6”</p>
<p>Under mathematics logic… called Contraposition…
if a = 2, then b = 6… therefore if b =/= 6, a =/=2
[Contraposition</a> - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrapositive]Contraposition”>Contraposition - Wikipedia)</p>
<p>look at the bottom:</p>
<p>“If an object is red, then it has color.”
“The contrapositive is “If an object does not have color, then it is not red”. This follows logically from our initial statement and, like it, it is evidently true.”</p>
<p>does that make sense?</p>
<p>do you guys remember what the question was to the amount of trees planted and which year would have so many times more? What was the question?</p>
<p>I could have sworn it was 1976, not 1980</p>
<p>@duke
1980 is the answer</p>
<p>I believe fanaticism was the answer to the penguins question; fanaticism implies extreme devotion, as the penguins did toward their homeland.</p>
<p>atavistic:
(of behaviour) happening because of a very old natural and basic habit from the distant past (= a long time ago), not because of a conscious decision or present need or usefulness
(from cambridge dictionary)</p>
<p>What was the wording of the question again?</p>
<p>hmm true but red is a subset of color - that defines a relationship. In this case the relationship is not defined it could be anything. So “if The object has color then it is red”. If the object is not red then it doesn’t have color, - which is false. I know i’m using a completely different relationship here, but the relationship simply isn’t defined so u have to assume any.</p>
<p>@hulster</p>
<p>the relationship isn’t defined?</p>
<p>but it has a box saying that exactly “if a =2, then b =3”…
isn’t it the same “if” and “then” relationship?</p>
<p>well… i’m not 100% sure…
but isn’t that… kinda common sense…?</p>
<p>if a =2, b has to be = 3…</p>
<p>so… if b is not 3… and a can be 2(and b =/=3?)…
^paradox…doesn’t really make sense</p>