<p>i had math experimental and i had zora neale hurston article?</p>
<p>Does anyone know the name of the “determined” writer who transformed her reputation? I loved the passage!</p>
<p>@College 550: Zora Neale Hurston</p>
<p>Was urbane one of the SC for the zora thing? I don’t remember which passages were experimental :(</p>
<p>@curry: I think it was patrician, my bad and spellcheck fail on my iPod. 
It was asking for uhh a word that was opposit commoner mannerisms? I think. </p>
<p>@f1y: yay! Me too. Thank you for confirmation.</p>
<p>@smooch: Great, thanks. </p>
<p>@purp: I debated for a second between verve and fortitude but settled on verve because it seemed more appropriate. The one about different opinions related to her generosity thus many friends but also stubborness so some inevitable enemies as well, something like that.</p>
<p>does ANYONE know which section was the math experimental :C</p>
<p>@Audacities: I got patrician also, thank you for confirmation; also, do you remember the one on plate tectonics that was about nuances?</p>
<p>@curry </p>
<p>oh… there’s one about something appropriate…</p>
<p>nuances - explain the nature of the plates’ actions?</p>
<p>question was like: why are the nuances appropriate?
tectus - builder greek terminology, risky…</p>
<p>Fraction of test takers that scored above 10 on the first test and above (or below?) 40 on the second: 1/2 or 0.5
Number of books bought from the poet: 200
Perimeter of Hexagon: 144
350% greater question: 5/21
Subset question with factors of 36 and 3: (2,4,9) - debated on but this seems to be the general consensus
Circles A,B,C share radius r question: 2 radical 2 r
Year that 1996 was 16x: 1980
If a=3, b=6: “a” cannot be 2 - debated on, no unequivocal answer
3 in digits number, four numbers to the 7th power: 7
(1/2)^X graph: ?? always decreasing/ always increased and decreasing
75 (angle of double bisect)
9<n^2<40 what is n: 4, 5, or 6 acceptable
4 (undefined at what positive number because 4-4 is 0)</p>
<p>Boyfriend and girlfriend article can be found: [Consequences</a> - Penelope Lively - Google Books](<a href=“Consequences - Penelope Lively - Google Books”>Consequences - Penelope Lively - Google Books)</p>
<p>The author would agree that politicians should: talk more about their own qualifications
Jigsaw: Make the idea more accessible
Dermis question: Pun vs Defining a term - debate
Penguin question: Pluralism vs. Fanaticism vs. Atavism -debate
How the friend treated the boyfriend: Apathy
How did her friend feel about the situation: Agitated or Jovial? key words in passage: excited anxiety, “I don’t know what your parents are going to say”, twittering
How did the father feel (cool touch): Reserved?
Support a previous claim. Small passage.
The magnitude of her memory
Figurative language.
Positive italicized: unexpected way
Main idea: Describe the origin of the marriage
Point of the painting: Memorialize their encounter
Tectonic plates nuance question: explain the nature of plates actions?
Why did the author use that tectus: ?? (reminder)</p>
<p>officious
portended
fanaticism.
ostracized… unwitting
sanctuary
coagulate
verve (experimental?)
patrician (experimental?)</p>
<p>does anyone remember the questions for tectus and nuance or the other answers?</p>
<p>Yep, curry, I said it was to explain how the plates worked like smooch. :)</p>
<p>what was the tone of the author for the geology text book on tectonic plates
i put caustic and then i switched to breezy</p>
<p>Did anyone NOT get the passages about animal land conservation?</p>
<p>animal land conservation? was that the one about passage 1: prefers linkage of small strips of lands passage 2: waste of conservation funds</p>
<p>does anyone remember the questions for tectus and nuance or the other answers?</p>
<p>i also put breezy!</p>
<p>was animal land experimental?
one answer was that it was not smart to waste funds in Southern california then</p>
<p>I also decided on breezy after a lot of debate, smooch. </p>
<p>f1y, I also did. Wasn’t it about conservation of southern California and strips of land connecting urban centers?</p>
<p>@Smooch and @Audacities. Yep D: I was so hoping that section to be the experimental one >.<</p>
<p>so… what was the experimental reading?</p>
<p>For the conservation set of problems, there was definitely one answer that was like… A) disbelief because __ b) disagree because ____ etc. (it wasn’t in that order but hopefully someone else remembers the actual answers). Wasn’t there also an answer that was “critical” somewhere? :0</p>
<p>I forgot what the 5/21 question was.
can anyone briefly go over the question?</p>