<p>For the supplemental essay, i was going to write about reading and discussing Death of a Salesman in English class…is it ok to assume the admissions officers are familiar with the basic story and the characters? I don’t really want to spend any of my 500 words explaining, “Biff and Happy are Willy’s sons…” =/</p>
<p>Well I think you should have a short introduction. You just cannot assume they know what you are talking about. You don’t have to give a summary but at least give information about events that you are going to refer to.
I wrote mine about “Siddharta” and I introduced his life as it was portrayed in the book, even though I’m sure the figure of Buddha is well known.</p>
<p>This is what I think at least.</p>
<p>I think you are safe not giving plot or character details. You could write things like “The discussion we had in class about Willy, the main character, was eye opening.” “Death of a Salesman” is such a well-known play that I think most people have some familiarity with it.</p>
<p>I would proceed with caution. Sure, its a well known play, but that doesnt mean everyone knows the plot.
If you are talking about the discussion in class and how that specifically has changed you, then thats fine. But if you are talking about the play itself and how it is like your life or w/e, then make sure that they know the plot.</p>
<p>If you get an AO who doesnt know the play, it might be a very bad thing…play it safe is my advice</p>
<p>Write it like you would expect an editorial in the New York Times to treat it.</p>
<p>Assume varying familiarity and give the bare essentials needed to grasp the point you’re making using this example.</p>
<p>Thanks for the advice guys :)</p>