<p>Isn’t that the truth, lgm?</p>
<p>While I’ve seen it referred to as “Rupert’s rag” by the cognoscenti here, the WSJ is a good bit more than a rung or two off the bottom though, isn’t it?</p>
<p>Good for her.</p>
<p>Isn’t that the truth, lgm?</p>
<p>While I’ve seen it referred to as “Rupert’s rag” by the cognoscenti here, the WSJ is a good bit more than a rung or two off the bottom though, isn’t it?</p>
<p>Good for her.</p>