Food for thought, @rosered55 . Thanks for the link.
@oldmom4896 That’s a sobering piece. We should all have legal arrangements for our care once we are unable to make decisions for ourselves. But IMO they can give a false sense of security, and the more detailed they are, the greater the peril. My parents laid out in their Advance Directives the circumstances under which they wanted the plug to be pulled, IIRC two weeks in a persistent vegetative state, and a doctor saying they wouldn’t come out of it. The problem was, that wasn’t Dad’s situation at the point that I began to re-think the “keep alive at all costs” idea. He had c.diff, renal failure, episodic respiratory failure, and brain damage from respiratory failure (on top of dementia). But no vegetative state. Plus he wasn’t on any machine, so there was no plug to pull. The question was, rather, should we stop treatment for the c diff? But that question isn’t covered in the document, even though it was clear to me and to his doctors that it was time to let him go. Luckily, Dad named me as his health care agent, and over a period of a month, I was able to convince my brothers that it was time to stop trying to preserve a life that was ready to end.
That month while my brothers accepted that it was time to stop treatment was absolutely hellish for both of my parents, and for me. Patients and families often don’t have any idea of the real-life ramifications of their wishes. “Never put me in a home” or “Keep me alive for 2 weeks” sounds well and good when you’re healthy and sitting in a lawyer’s office. I’m sure what Mom and Dad envisioned was 2 weeks on comfortable life support, then pulling the plug, followed by a quick and serene death – or 1 week, 6 days on comfortable life support, followed by a full recovery and return to their previous life. Maybe it happens that way sometimes, but it could also very well be that neither the 2 weeks nor the death would be quick, painless, serene, or any other good thing. And there’s just no way at all that an 80-something is going to come back from a coma and go back to their life, and no one is doing themselves or their family a favor by imagining that it’s possible.
We all have an understandable desire to control what happens to us when we’re old and feeble and demented, and certainly no one wants to end their days in a nursing home. But it’s completely impossible to anticipate all the things that might go wrong with our bodies and minds, what treatments may or may not be available and appropriate and effective, what kind of care we might need and what options there might be for care. If nothing else, we need to think about the position we’re putting our children in, because it is unknowable how we might be tying their hands, and what kind of hell we might be putting them through someday. The best thing for our kids, and probably for us, is to name a proxy we trust, and then let that person deal with the complexities when the time comes.
The comments in the piece were also good. Several commenters pointed out that the authors, instead of sending the patient to live out her life in skilled nursing, could have and should have talked to the kids about setting up in-home hospice. That would have allowed the kids to honor their mom’s wishes, while also getting her professional care.