<p>Good morning!
RM, your neighborhood sounds a lot like the one I ultimately spent my teen years in once my mother, via marriage to my stepfather, began reproducing in her 40s
She’s now outlasted most of her neighbors who ultimately seem to downsize and move away. The next door neighbors were her best friends and she was really blue when they moved just a few years back. But it’s still nice to know that even today were I so-inclined I could call a neighbor to check on her. </p>
<p>When I was younger, being in the news biz, as was my h#1, we tended to move around too much to ever really get attached to a neighborhood. And when you have a byline or are a talking head as the case may be, you come to value your privacy. </p>
<p>In terms of my favorite social neighborhood, it would have to be the last community I lived in in Canada. I was on a two acre lot that was heavily treed but connected by a nice bike path to the lake and a golf club across the street, with lots of nearby mature developments in a community I’d covered years before so knew a lot of people. For me, that was a perfect mix of nature and social, and is the one place I miss the most. I was involved in a lot of community groups there, which likely made a difference.</p>
<p>But here, I don’t know if its the demands of owning a business or the fact that I spend a lot of time downtown via the studio or just the rugged beauty of the area I now live in, but I’ve come to feel almost claustrophobic when I’m at homes built on top of one another, which seems to be the trend these days. To put a 5,000 SF house on a 10,000 SF lot out here seems crazy to me. But that’s what they’re doing in my neck of the woods (literally), likely because it costs a fortune to service the land, eg. No sewers, so they have to use PAC systems, etc. and the land is expensive, because it is beautiful.</p>
<p>So I think what had my neighbor so ticked was the influx of “city folk” who toured his home and ostensibly, presumably, want to live out here “away from it all” or for the award-winning school district, but don’t seem to actually like the LAND
There’s a real divide of sorts out here in terms of attitude about things. People accustomed to living in the city, for example, move here and actually think crazy things like council should do something about all the dangerous deer in the roads or that folks shouldn’t hunt their own land
(of course, there’s a symbiotic relationship here that often escapes them :))</p>
<p>I think the rural/suburban differential is happening in a lot of rustic areas under development. In my township, what the planning council has done that developers hate is to have made it very difficult to develop on anything less than a three acre parcel by creating a new Zoning class for the “heritage river area.” This actually makes sense due to the density pressure on both the river and the habitat. But the township line is just north of me, and that’s where the heavy, close development is encroaching. Typically, a golf course will develop a waste water management plan, put in a PAC system, then sell off developable lots. It does give buyers the best if both, but it drives the “heritage” folks crazy
The presiding fear is that the city will gobble them up, I think! </p>