Parents of the HS class of 2010 - Original

<p>Kat Thanks so much. That was great information. Maybe I was just in denial, huh? </p>

<p>Currently working on EFC on CB.</p>

<p>DougBetsy: Have a good visit at F&M tomorrow. ED was encouraged at our F&M info session a few weeks back, but if there’s any additional information on that topic, given the discussions on the F&M forum and the ā€œ>50% EDā€ thread, I would be interested, as well.</p>

<p>Regarding merit aid vs. need-based aid: D, herself, now won’t look into any private school not offering merit. She plans to go on to graduate school and figures that she’s afraid of taking on a significant amount of student debt for her undergraduate education. Another thought that’s occurred to us with the economic downturn is how accessible are student loans going to be in the near future? I think it’s kind of a shame that there are some ā€œnon-merit aidā€ schools that would be good fits for her that she’s passing up, but I do understand and appreciate that she’s being pragmatic.</p>

<p>I wouldn’t rule out large state schools, necessarily. I got a fantastic education at Texas. Yes, it’s a huge university (48,000 when I was there), but I was in the engineering school, and most of my classes weren’t very large. I spent a lot of my time in Cockrell Hall with a small group of students. I never had any problem talking to professors, even in large history classes. One of my FAVORITE classes all four years was US History - there must have been 300 kids in there, but the professor was wonderful and kept us on the edge of our seats. I would go into his office and have great conversations with him - he tried to get me to switch my major to history! I also got the chance to take classes from world-famous engineers and scientists.</p>

<p>I really had to bite my tongue as S and I toured small LACs and they would give us the large-schools-are-evil-and-horrible spiel!</p>

<p>interesting MaineLonghorn (give me a while, and you will eventually become ML) I went to another ā€œbigā€ school, half the size of yours, but the engineering college was 900 and my major was 100 and I still had predominantly lecture classes into my senior year, except for some humanities classes. I guess it really depends. My D is currently in a small high school with 10-15 student discussion based classes and doesn’t want to lose that in a college environment. One thing she hasn’t done yet is sit in on a class. It’s great to hear how some kids really loved doing that, she hasn’t had interest even when there has been one in a convenient time and subject. Hope she warms up to that eventually.</p>

<p>09 thread is really humming these days. I’m waiting till next week to give one big CONGRATS but if any of you are reading here you know we are all thinking it.</p>

<p>congrats on the senior member status LIMOM! :)</p>

<p>Way to go LIMOM!!! First of the Junior parents to become a senior :)</p>

<p>Ok not the first… but still funny :)</p>

<p>way to pad that post count scualum! :slight_smile: We’ll be there before the end of the year, methinks…</p>

<p>LIMOMOF2: I have looked at Geneseo several times in passing, but I have some concerns. Class size seems to be an issue despite the public LAC moniker, and given the economy, I don’t expect the situation to improve. Also, is the lack of geographic diversity noticeable? Any parents here familiar with Geneseo?</p>

<p>scualum: What, I don’t count? I know I’m not a parent, but still. I’ve been senior for a while… ;)</p>

<p>clap clap for you to Keilexandra! :D</p>

<p>I’m sure there are others also, who have their oldest in this cohort. Step forward and name yourselves!</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Yeah, momonthehill, those ED stats are :eek:. (Did you see the one where F&M only has a 7% yield for RD?) DH and I have already issued the edict that we will not allow ED for any school. Just don’t want to give up the option of exploring all financial possibilities. So, I’ll listen to F&M talk about it, but with a skeptic’s ear.</p>

<p>Keil:</p>

<p>Many apologies - The junior to senior thing just popped into my head - so I typed it - only to scroll up and see you, VicariousParent and ag54 all with Senior status…</p>

<p>Of course, LIMOM is the only one to do it entirely within this thread (just kidding but she is close :slight_smile: )</p>

<p>As for you JackieF - I learned all about padding from you :)</p>

<p>It’s true, scualum- I spend a lot of time here on the 2010 thread. And thanks for the congrats, jackief. I wouldn’t have noticed if you hadn’t mentioned it. :)</p>

<p>Keilexandra - my D’s GC suggested Geneseo as another state option for her - but D hasn’t even looked at it yet, and I’ve only taken a quick peek at their website. I believe my D has a friend who goes there, but I’m not sure they keep in touch. I’ll ask her, and if they do, I’ll have her ask him what he thinks of the school, and about the number of students in his classes.</p>

<p>In the category of learn something new every day … </p>

<p>in this thread:</p>

<p><a href=ā€œhttp://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parents-forum/677825-regular-decision-class-2013-statistics.html[/url]ā€>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/parents-forum/677825-regular-decision-class-2013-statistics.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>xiggi posted about looking at the common data set to see how many kids were admitted off of the waiting list in the year of that data set. </p>

<p>I never knew that information existed - but it is nice to know that it is there to use as a point of reference in the event your child is waitlisted.</p>

<p>Hi guys.</p>

<p>I posted this on another thread here, but I wanted to come ā€œhome to my groupā€ to see what you guys think. The thread was about the perfect intellectual student with no ECs and how they would fare in the admissions process for the top 100 or so colleges. A parent chimed in that she had first hand evidence of kids getting dinged for not having the triangle (academics, ECs and leadership.)</p>

<p>The question I pose to you all is how is leadership defined in the context of college admissions. Here’s what I wrote:</p>

<p>Since there are only so many leadership positions on any team/club, and I’ve read that colleges prefer depth with the ECs (e.g. several years at the same thing vs dabbling all over the map), I can’t see why a kid who doesn’t have an ā€œofficerā€ position should be dinged. Why?</p>

<p>I may suggest my ā€œnon-officeredā€ S write an essay on how one leads without having the title, because this happens in the real world all the time. In his case, he can use one example. He’s been with mock trial since MS. However, his commitment to sports (lots of after school time for these) doesn’t also allow him to be a mock trial attorney any more, in all fairness to the team. However, he’s made himself into a fine witness role (and showed the other witnesses how to do it), because he did the lawyer role before. He’s won awards for it. He’s leading all right, to the point that the mock trial members have begged him to drop the water polo and swim team so he’d have the time to be an attorney next year.</p>

<p>FAP (we love you too :slight_smile: )</p>

<p>I think your example is a good one, and I know there are several kids who are probably in similar circumstances. D has been passed over for team captain positions, and although she has run for class officer as I saw in that other thread, those elections are primarily popularity and she has also not succeeded. She has done things behind the scenes helping out with some class projects, the teacher class advisor commented to me once how big a help it was. She has also lead in a quieter as the oldest member of one sports team and the oldest in one subgroup in another. But she is not one to toot her horn and she would never bring these up. Luckily, she has other areas where she has demonstrated leadership objectively, so that will probably suffice for her.</p>

<p>Although your son might not have any leadership titles, he is involved in a lot of stuff and I’m sure some of these aspects will come through in his recommendations.</p>

<p>I am a bit behind in that other thread, but I’d also say there is a difference between no ECs and no leadership ā€œtitlesā€</p>

<p>FAP - I think you make a great point - and I’m sure that admissions officers will recognize the depth of your son’s commitment to his ECs, whether he’s had traditional leadership roles or not. </p>

<p>Jackief - you’re right - there’s a huge difference between no ECs and no leadership titles.</p>

<p>S2 has refused to run for offices next year. Says kids are coming out of the woodwork as rising seniors to assume leadership roles in groups they’ve only been peripherally involved with. Cynic that he is, he feels it’s just resume padding and will have nothing to do with it. Here’s hoping that what he’s done in a couple of ECs over many years shows what he’s really all about!</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>DougBetsy, yes I saw those stats. And that 7% figure does make me concerned for RD applicants. My husband and I are on the same page as you when it comes to ED: We don’t D to make any binding commitment that’s going to put us at the mercy of a school’s FA, or lack thereof. As I mentioned previously, after visiting the campus, D really likes F&M, and intends to return there to meet with one or two professors, and also to interview. Hopefully, those follow-up visits will convey her serious interest in the school, even with the RD application. Once again, I hope you and your son have an enjoyable and informative visit tomorrow.</p>

<p>FindAPlace–It sounds like your son took a potential admissions obstacle and effectively turned it around in his favor. The lack of ā€œleadershipā€ positions was an issue for D1 when she applied to schools. Unfortunately, leadership opportunities are limited and, like jackief mentioned, so many HS clubs choose leaders based upon popularity. D1 tried to emphasize, either through her supplemental essays, or in admissions interviews, the fact that she stayed with her ECs consistently and elaborate on her contributions to each group.</p>

<p>Re Geneseo: I know its rep, but in touring many kids I know have sat in classes and found them to be more like high school classes. My S sat in on one (US History) and said he was the only one answering questions. He settled on Stony Brook as his instate financial safety.</p>

<p>I have known people to rave about Geneseo, however, so I guess one needs to see for oneself.</p>