Early decision: This is kind of a sore topic for me.
I find ED unethical, and refuse to sign off on any applications my children want to send off ED. I hold this position on two grounds: (1) It increases the relative positioning of applicants who already have other advantages, by presenting an option with a higher likelihood of admission most places that is only guaranteed affordable for high-income households that can afford to possibly be full-pay, and (2, perhaps more importantly) it removes the ability of an applicant to judge between multiple offers, and by removing that the colleges themselves are agreeing to eliminate any competition of that sort that would be to the student’s advantage, and that doesn’t pass the smell test with me.
People say it’s only worthwhile if you’re 100% sure of your first choice college and you can afford it; I agree, but would argue that it isn’t even worth it then, because it distorts the market for everyone else to a degree that isn’t healthy even for the ED applicants.
My daughter has her second admissions interview coming up next month, at Muhlenberg. (Her first was last summer, coming up unexpectedly when we toured Earlham.) Muhlenberg, to their credit, is up-front about a lot of things in their admissions and financial-aid processes that a lot of other schools do but don’t admit to, like packaging financial aid packages differently (in terms not just of size, but of loan:grant ratios) depending on how badly they want a student. Well, another thing they’re up-front about is that they really, really want applicants to apply ED, and that they will grill (they don’t use that word) you in your interview on why you’re not doing so if you aren’t. I’ve already told my daughter that she can blame it on me, saying that I’m a college professor who finds ED unethical for some reason, and that she shouldn’t feel obligated to state that she feels quite the same (if not even more so), even though that is the case.
Of the 11 schools in the SOS, 6 have ED but not EA, 1 has EA but not ED, 1 has both, and the remaining 3 have neither. My daughter is quite aware that not applying ED puts her at a relative disadvantage at those 7 schools that offer it, but she’s comfortable with that. She’s also remarked that at some level the 6 schools with ED but no EA are putting themselves at a competitive disadvantage with her, because she’s going to be getting her applications in early and will likely already have heard back from the remaining 5 (the ones without EA still promise an at least relatively quick admissions decision, so an early-submission application is effectively an EA application with them), giving her a chance to fall in love with those schools before she gets a chance to do so with the others.