I read the article yesterday and have spent some time thinking about it, too.
(As an aside, Jeff Selingo was an intern at US News & World Report after his junior year of college, in 1994, as part of a national magazine journalism internship program. I met my DH in that same program the same summer, although we were in NYC instead of DC. I don’t remember if I ever met Jeff back then, but I feel a kinship!
)
I’m with you on the “maximum rigor” part. My girls are/were at a private college prep school, although certainly not the most intense one in our area. It offers 27 AP courses (but no IB, and dual enrollment is not allowed) – but limits kids to 6 total. Stronger students can petition to take more, but even those kids max out at maybe 9 or 10.
Meanwhile, the kids at our local public schools are taking 14-15 AP courses – because they’re allowed to take them in the summers. That seems excessive to me, but I think it’s all relative.
And speaking of relative, I think the overall belief in the US is that attending very selective schools – certainly the Ivy League, but maybe also top 20 – is the ultimate achievement. It signifies that you are intelligent and will be connected to elite circles. Depending on the industry, it will give you a huge leg up in life. And in general – that’s all true.
Of course, most sensible people also know that there are a million equally brilliant kids at every kind of school, and a good number of them will be equally successful. Plus, there are a hundred reasons why someone might not choose a selective school, even if one had the stats to be admitted – cost, location, vibe, fit, whatever.
As much as we pooh-pooh prestige, I understand the appeal of it. I mean, it’s silly to worry about what other people think. We all know that. But I think we’re all susceptible to it on some level. I’m hella proud of my kid that is at a top 20 school – not because it’s highly ranked, but more because it offers a top-notch education, it’s hard to get in, and she’s brainy and worked her arse off and is fully qualified to be there. And at the same time, I know that’s stupid, because there are thousands of other kids equally qualified to be there who didn’t get in simply because of limited spots. So, am I proud that she lucked out?
I’m also hella proud of my younger kid who is at an in-state directional school. It’s only been a couple months, but he’s enjoying his classes and taking advantage of the opportunities presented to him. No idea if it’s even ranked, but it’s a very good fit for him so far.
I do wonder what would happen if all the rankings were to disappear tomorrow. Would there no longer be a flurry of applications to the top-50 or top-100 schools, making acceptance rates much higher? Would we then focus solely on fit instead of prestige?