I see both sides of the Tulane thing ā first, I think a student should only ED if they are absolutely, without question ready to commit to a school if admitted, no matter what happens with merit aid. I believe the agreements that the student, parent and school have to sign back up that fact.
The only exception I can understand is if something unforeseen happens with the familyās finances to change them significantly between the time of application and commitment (job loss or emergency, etc).
But I donāt think itās fair for a student to expect X amount in merit aid, then back out of ED if they donāt get it. That goes against the agreement.
It sounds like these students backed out of their ED agreements with Tulane without justifiable cause. Is Tulane in the right to āpunishā the whole school for that? Meh, debatable. I donāt feel strongly either way about their action.
But second, I really dislike Tulaneās whole game of taking the majority of their incoming class in ED, and then the hard sell they give EA applicants to convert to ED. They seem to be so obsessed with their yield rate that it colors their admission policy overall.
Itās possible Iām still salty because of the experience D22 had, lol. She was genuinely interested in Tulane, toured the school, applied EA. She was a tippy top student but was hoping for some (rare) merit aid, so she didnāt feel comfortable applying ED. I canāt remember how many emails she got asking her to convert to ED ā but it was at least one every couple of weeks, if not once a week.
She declined to convert, was then deferred in EA, and waitlisted in RD. (She did not accept a waitlist spot.) But another two or three kids in her class (small class of 137 in another state) got in EA. Their stats werenāt nearly as strong. I realize there could be a hundred reasons why these other students were more desirable candidates, but the whole thing just rubbed us the wrong way.
Tulane potentially had a lot of things to offer for D26, but after her sisterās experience, she opted not to apply.