<p>they can’t stop giving legacy preference, that’s how they make money. harvard manages to put together a talented class but still gives legacy preference.
I’m a legacy who will be applying in a few years to wharton, so I should cross my fingers</p>
<p>No they won’t abandon legacy entirely, but Penn weighs legacy quite a bit more than other schools do, particularly (and some say only) in ED. They also have a very generous definition of “legacy”, as opposed to other schools. Sure hope that doesn’t change, but reading between the lines, it looks like international and minority applicants may be getting a further leg up with Stetson’s replacement. Time will tell.</p>
<p>I don’t get why people credit deans of admission with lowered acceptance rates. It seems that’s more owing to administrative decisions by the university to make itself more awesome.</p>
<p>Stetson certainly contributed with his brilliant ED coup that was (and is) a boon to Penn, but I don’t know if this Furda guy actually can take credit for any improvement at Columbia.</p>
<p>the artice said that during Furda’s regime, international recruitment went up, lets hope that that helps the chances of us internationals, especially those not applying for aid :D</p>
<p>It’s also foolish to overlook NYC’s massive recovery during the same period of time, which has made it a much more attractive place to go to school. The city’s crime rate has fallen by probably around 50% since he took over.</p>