<p>That’s an interesting question, wildflower.</p>
<p>On the one hand, as a student who paid my entire way through school myself, it would be tempting to do in three years what I would have had to do in four. Assuming that the tuition is not increased to make up for the “lost year” (as the Northwestern program has done), this could be a very attractive option.</p>
<p>On the other hand, however, I imagine that you would lose a lot in terms of the activities that you participate in (like law review, toastmasters, etc.) and the people who you have time to bond with by doing an accelerated program. One of the nicest parts of the JD program and the MBA program (whether done together or separately) is that as a 1L in law school, you spend the vast majority of your time taking classes with the same group of students, who I really bonded with, and as a first year MBA candidate, you take all of your classes with your cohort (again, the same group of students who move through all of your classes with you), with whom you also develop a real bond. I wouldn’t trade the personal or professional relationships that I developed while in school for anything, and I’m not certain that I would have these same bonds if I had a year less and a much more frantic schedule while in school. These friends have worked with me on business deals, have served as sounding boards on business and legal issues and are real friends, who have spent time with me at my home and in their homes, who joined me at my wedding and who do more than just send holiday cards every year.</p>
<p>Further, it was only during my final year of law school and my last semester of business school that I really got to take the courses that I wanted to take instead of the ones that I was supposed to take. For example, even though I wasn’t headed for a career as a litigator, everyone took a course in evidence during their 2L year. As a 2L, I also took courses in securities regulation, federal taxation, corporations, etc., all of which are prerequisite classes for the really interesting classes I wanted to take as a 3L. When I was a 3L, I was finally able to take advanced seminars in securities law reform, advanced M&A theory and individual rights and health care, all of which were real areas of interest for me. These classes were very small, very discussion oriented and very interesting. I would probably have missed out on these opportunities had I raced through law school. </p>
<p>For me, the JD/MBA program is already shortened by one year over the amount of time that the separate programs would take to complete. I’m not sure that shortening the programs by another year won’t do damage to the experience and learnings of the joint degree program. I suppose that only time will tell.</p>
<p>I might have a different opinion after these programs have been in place for a few years, but for now, I wouldn’t choose the 3-year program. I gained so much during that final year of the joint program that I really couldn’t imagine losing out on those opportunities.</p>