<p>Apparently, out of the most fit cities in America, San Francisco was ranked 8th while Los Angeles was ranked 38th. I find this odd because Los Angeles seems to be the land of the low-carb, zero trans fat, salt-free, organic whole foods, gym rat, image obsessed type of people and you’d think they’d be at the top of a list like this. So, perhaps there are more good-looking healthy people in the Bay Area and less in Los Angeles than previously anticipated by those who have made the argument that the reason to go to UCLA is because of the “hot girls.” Anyways… just a thought.</p>
<p>i’m not surprised at all…los angeles never struck out to be any of those things you mentioned lol, especially not organic whole foods…that has to be the bay haha (though i think i live near the largest whole foods in the nation, the one near de anza…)</p>
<p>Have you ever BEEN to Berkeley!?? THAT is the land of Low Carb/Organic stuff! :D<br> @evan that may be, but I’ll take a higher concentration of fit people any day
So you’ve got more fatties @ ucla, congrats hahaha jk jk</p>
<p>haha, sorry, california’s largest XD i just remember hearing about it/reading about it in the newspaper when it first opened (2 years ago?), still somewhat relevant to this conversation though since the bay and la are both in cali lol, and i just have to say, palo alto is a very very fit place lol</p>
<p>They are indeed more plastic I’ve lived here in LA all my life, and believe me, it was a breath of fresh air to meet NorCal People I didn’t even mind the hellas</p>
<p>and you know, everyone talks about the “hotties” at UCLA but I didn’t see any when I went. I hope I see them at orientation or in the fall. My standards aren’t even that high because after two years at my cc, pretty much any decent looking person is an upgrade.</p>