<p>This essay comes from one of my students in Tianjin, I’m looking forward to any comment!! </p>
<p>OC Test 2</p>
<p>Are bad choices and good choices equally likely to have negative consequence?</p>
<p>Why Socrates in Greek and Confucius in China are still well-known in the whole world? Are their theories unbreakable? Are their methods able to heritage from era to era? Definitely not. Though Confucius stated out the point of benevolence, also he deprived oneself of right of independence (means that people need to obey the hierarchy). Every choice that has been made suffers a corresponding and contemporary flaw. In the choice-maker-society, the choice-has-been-made is strikingly support the development and aslo serves as a promising and hopeful force in the era. </p>
<p>Technology I loved and next to technology Epoch. Every theory comes from its own era, being the best choice for people of that age. For the fact that human apply the knowledge to practice daily life; different life in different era has different methods to make progress, however what really matters is what provide an opportunity to improve the manpower. Walt , the reformer of steam engine, altered the course of life; he brought us the age of steam----industrialization become the main stream for the society. Whereas, the steam engine of industrial revolution is not only a source of high manpower, but also a significant source of pollution. We would never accompany with a good atmosphere as we enjoyed in the last century. In the Epoch of 17 century, people has no sense of enormous cost of environment. No doubt, the industrial revolution was a good choice, but also is a negative choice.</p>
<p>Further more, the famous British economist Adam Smith, the author of Wealth of Nations and the representer of classic economy. He was a complete sponsor and advocator of his theory----the modern free-market. His theory was a source of happiness satisfaction for the capitalism society: businessmen competed against the mastery of the market in different fields, they enjoyed the benefit they exploited from the nature, and used the money to make much more money, meantime the money propelled the development of industrialization. It could be seen as the best theory in the era. However, it still cannot overcome conquer obstacles of the age limitations. In the 1930s, came the massacre diaster----Economy Crisis. After enough time to compete in the market, the monopoly capitalism came to break the order, the immerse of them distinct the reasonable competition. During the crisis, many people died and many businessmen, for the sake, rather pour the milk made by the plants than shared them to the homeless. Then the good choice went away, came a very bad effect. Then the new one of State Monopoly Capitalism established by John Maynard Keynes has saved the people out from the devil. But how long can it last, will some more advanced replace the current circumstance？</p>
<p>This a mission unpredictable. The strange phenomenon of good choices usually becomes bad will last forever. Were no that phenomenon, no revolve of the social root----economy, which leads people to a happy endless.</p>