<p>Does anyone know what the criteria for gays are? Do they differ from those of females? I’m really curious about that.</p>
<p>And then there are some boys who really value intellectual discussions in their partner (I don’t care that much about intelligence, so long as it’s enough to merit intellectual discussions or understanding the way I approach my life - which is based a lot on neologisms that aren’t particularly easy to fully appreciate)? But honestly, even I value beauty. I will date someone who isn’t pretty, but only because my rational belief system propels me to do so. </p>
<ul>
<li>this USUALLY isn’t the case - there are highly unusual cases, I consider myself one</li>
</ul>
<p>My main criteria is actually “lack of societal influence”. This is mostly related to stability though (since my belief system is extremely cold and disheartening - it takes someone without societal influence to appreciate it - and this is difficult - I took months to fully appreciate mine). I’m not quite sure though. John Nash’s wife seems societally influenced, but if someone like his wife were to approach me, I’d probably be open (actually, I’d probably be open to just about anyone who approaches me, provided that she’s make decent replies some of my e-mails). My defining characteristic is that I mass-send e-mails.</p>