<p>I’m sure somebody already mentioned this in CC, I just want to make sure. In the AMSCO book on page 602, did they mix up Esboedo v Illinois and Miranda v Arizona? </p>
<p>In all the detective movies I’ve seen, criminals are read Miranda rights which is the right to remain silent but AMSCO says it is right to have a lawyer present during quesitioning which I’m pretty sure is Escobedo v Illinois. </p>
<p>Are there any other errors in the AMSCO book? </p>
<p>Bill of rights 2nd amendment.</p>
<p>both of them have to do with the right to an attorney just wikipedia both of them and see if Miranda v Arizona makes sense
This is the full miranda warning:
they have the right to remain silent;
anything the suspect does say can and MAY be used against them;
they have the right to have an attorney present before and during the questioning; and
they have the right, if they cannot afford the services of an attorney, to have one appointed, at public expense and without cost to them, to represent them before and during the questioning.[43]</p>